Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34665254›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2022

Dietary Intake of Fatty Acids and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: A Case-Control Study.

Donghui Li, Jiali Zheng, Rikita Hatia, Manal Hassan, Carrie R Daniel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donghui LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7542-0662
Jiali ZhengDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rikita HatiaDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Manal HassanDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Carrie R DanielDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Molecular Epidemiology of Pancreatic CancerR01CA098380 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LI, DONGHUI · 2004 to 2008
$2.6M
Dietary Nitrosamines and Risk of Pancreatic CancerR03CA137803 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LI, DONGHUI · 2008 to 2009
$162k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098380NCI NIH HHS R03 CA137803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiological findings on dietary fat intake and risk of pancreatic cancer (PanC) are inconsistent.

objectivesThis study aimed to determine the association between types of dietary fat intake and PanC.

methodsWe conducted a hospital-based case-control study in 957 pathologically confirmed PanC cases and 938 cancer-free controls. Cases and controls were frequency matched by age, sex, and race. Dietary information was collected using a self-administered validated FFQ. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the ORs and 95% CIs of PanC risk by quintiles of fat intake with the lowest quintile as referent and with adjustment for other risk factors and dietary factors.

resultsWe observed no difference in (median) intake of total fat standardized for energy among cases versus controls. The multivariable-adjusted OR (95% CI) of the highest versus the lowest quintile of intake (ORQ5 compared with Q1) was 2.51 (1.68-3.72) for fat from animal sources and 0.41 (0.29-0.58) for fat from plant sources. Intakes of total MUFA, total PUFA, and linoleic (n-6) and long chain n-3 fatty acids were inversely associated with PanC (ORQ5 compared with Q1 and 95% CI: 0.55 [0.36-0.82], 0.59 [0.42-0.82], 0.64 [0.43-0.84], and 0.60 [0.42-0.84], respectively). Arachidonic acid (n-6) and several SFAs were positively associated with PanC.

conclusionAlthough some observed associations with pancreatic cancer risk could be explained by reverse causation, the potential protective associations with intakes of largely plant-derived PUFAs and MUFAs and fish-derived long chain n-3 PUFAs warrant further prospective investigation.

Indexed as

Fatty AcidsPancreatic NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDietary FatsEatingHumansRisk FactorsDietary FatsFatty Acidsdietary fatnutspancreatic cancersaturated fatunsaturated fat

Identifiers

PMID34665254
PMCPMC8826846
OpenAlexW3205439892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.