ArticleJAMA network open2021
Analysis of Suicide After Cancer Diagnosis by US County-Level Income and Rural vs Urban Designation, 2000-2016.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Suicide Risk in Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Brief Review of Risk Factors, Screening, and Prevention.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Review
- Rural-urban disparities in cardiovascular and other competing risk of death among cancer patients.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Developing and validating a nomogram of suicide risk in lung cancer patients based on the SEER database.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Neighborhood Deprivation and Suicide Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Risk assessment and predictive modeling of suicide in multiple myeloma patients.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Prevalence and predictors of substance use as a factor in suicide in the USA, 2015-2020: a repeated cross-sectional analysis.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- The contribution of household income to rectal cancer patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes from 2010 to 2020.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Geographic Variation, Economic Activity, and Labor Market Characteristics in Trajectories of Suicide in the United States, 2008-2020.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Suicide among Cancer Patients: Current Knowledge and Directions for Observational Research.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Regional disparities in suicide among patients with cancer: A nationwide population-based study in Japan.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Suicide rates among patients with first and second primary cancer.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2023Article
- Suicidal Ideation Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Clinical and Sociodemographic Predictors of Suicidal Ideation Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Incidence, Timing, and Factors Associated With Suicide Among Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cancer in the US.JAMA oncology · 2023Article
- Suicide Risk Among Individuals Diagnosed With Cancer in the US, 2000-2016.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Incidence and risk factors for suicidal ideation in a sample of Chinese patients with mixed cancer types.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- The role of context in shaping the relationship between physical health and suicide over the life course.SSM - population health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Studies suggest the risk of suicide among people with cancer diagnosis is higher compared with the general population. However, little is known about how suicide risk among people diagnosed with cancer might vary according to area-level income and rurality. Objective: To examine whether the risks and patterns of suicide mortality among people with a cancer diagnosis differ by US county-level median income and rural or urban status. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective, population-based cohort study following up individuals who were diagnosed with cancer between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016, was conducted. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program 18 registries (SEER 18) database was used to obtain data on persons diagnosed with a first primary malignant tumor. Comparisons with the general US population were based on mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. Analyses were conducted from February 22 to October 14, 2020. Exposures: County-level median household income and urban or rural status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of suicide deaths and annual percentage changes (APCs) of SMRs. Results: The SEER 18 database included 5 362 782 persons with cancer diagnoses living in 635 counties. Most study participants were men (51.2%), White (72.2%), and older than 65 years (49.7%). Among them, 6357 persons died of suicide (SMR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.38-1.44). People with cancer living in the lowest-income counties had a significantly higher risk (SMR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.76-2.13) than those in the highest-income counties (SMR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.26-1.34). Those living in rural counties also had significantly higher SMR than those in urban counties (SMR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.70-1.92 vs SMR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.32-1.39). For all county groups, the SMRs were the highest within the first year following cancer diagnosis. However, among people living in the lowest-income counties, the risk remained significantly high even after 10 or more years following cancer diagnosis (SMR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.31-2.48). The comparative risk of suicide mortality within 1 year following cancer diagnosis significantly decreased over the years but then plateaued in the highest-income (2005-2015: APC, 2.03%; 95% CI, -0.97% to 5.13%), lowest-income (2010-2015: APC, 4.80%; 95% CI, -19.97% to 37.24%), and rural (2004-2015: APC, 1.83; 95% CI, -1.98% to 5.79%) counties. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study showed disparities in suicide risks and their patterns among people diagnosed with cancer by county-level income and rural or urban status. The findings suggest that additional research and effort to provide psychological services addressing these disparities among people with cancer may be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.