Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34665224›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2021

Prognostic value of comprehensive intracoronary physiology assessment early after heart transplantation.

Jung-Min Ahn, Frederik M Zimmermann, Satish Arora, Ole-Geir Solberg, Oskar Angerås, Katrine Rolid, Muzammil Rafique, Lars Aaberge, Kristjan Karason, Kozo Okada and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Can the grading of mild cardiac allograft vasculopathy be further refined? An angiographic and physiologic assessment of heart transplant recipients with ISHLT CAV 1.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Added prognostic value of visually estimated coronary artery calcium among heart transplant recipients.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Invasive Coronary Physiology in Heart Transplant Recipients: State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Jung-Min AhnDepartment of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Frederik M ZimmermannDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room H2103, Stanford, CA 94305-5218, USA.
Satish AroraDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Ole-Geir SolbergDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4844-7392
Oskar AngeråsDepartment of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Katrine RolidDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Muzammil RafiqueDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Lars AabergeDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Kristjan KarasonDepartment of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2802-1191
Kozo OkadaDivision of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Helen LuikartDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room H2103, Stanford, CA 94305-5218, USA.
Kiran K KhushDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room H2103, Stanford, CA 94305-5218, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9697-5926
Yasuhiro HondaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room H2103, Stanford, CA 94305-5218, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0102-7841
Nico H J PijlsCatharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Sang Eun LeeDepartment of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae-Joong KimDepartment of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Jung ParkDepartment of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Lars GullestadDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
William F FearonDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room H2103, Stanford, CA 94305-5218, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1799-1368
Oslo University Hospital · NOUlsan College · KRCardiovascular Institute of the South · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEVA Palo Alto Health Care System · USYokohama City University Medical Center · JP

Funding

PCSK9 Inhibition after Heart TransplantationR33HL139929 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FEARON, WILLIAM F · 2020 to 2023
$1.8M
ACE Inhibition and Cardiac Allograft VasculopathyR01HL093475 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FEARON, WILLIAM F · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL093475NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL139929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe evaluated the long-term prognostic value of invasively assessing coronary physiology after heart transplantation in a large multicentre registry. METHODS AND

resultsComprehensive intracoronary physiology assessment measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR), the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) was performed in 254 patients at baseline (a median of 7.2 weeks) and in 240 patients at 1 year after transplantation (199 patients had both baseline and 1-year measurement). Patients were classified into those with normal physiology, reduced FFR (FFR ≤ 0.80), and microvascular dysfunction (either IMR ≥ 25 or CFR ≤ 2.0 with FFR > 0.80). The primary outcome was the composite of death or re-transplantation at 10 years. At baseline, 5.5% had reduced FFR; 36.6% had microvascular dysfunction. Baseline reduced FFR [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-6.15; P = 0.088] and microvascular dysfunction (aHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.44-1.79; P = 0.73) were not predictors of death and re-transplantation at 10 years. At 1 year, 5.0% had reduced FFR; 23.8% had microvascular dysfunction. One-year reduced FFR (aHR 2.98, 95% CI 1.13-7.87; P = 0.028) and microvascular dysfunction (aHR 2.33, 95% CI 1.19-4.59; P = 0.015) were associated with significantly increased risk of death or re-transplantation at 10 years. Invasive measures of coronary physiology improved the prognostic performance of clinical variables (χ2 improvement: 7.41, P = 0.006). However, intravascular ultrasound-derived changes in maximal intimal thickness were not predictive of outcomes.

conclusionAbnormal coronary physiology 1 year after heart transplantation was common and was a significant predictor of death or re-transplantation at 10 years.

Indexed as

Coronary StenosisFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHeart TransplantationCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsHumansMicrocirculationPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisCardiac allograft vasculopathyCoronary stenosisHeart transplantationMicrovascular dysfunctionPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34665224
PMCPMC8691805
OpenAlexW3207239007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.