Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34665205›Full record

ArticleJAMA2021

Association of Tramadol vs Codeine Prescription Dispensation With Mortality and Other Adverse Clinical Outcomes.

Junqing Xie, Victoria Y Strauss, Daniel Martinez-Laguna, Cristina Carbonell-Abella, Adolfo Diez-Perez, Xavier Nogues, Gary S Collins, Sara Khalid, Antonella Delmestri, Aleksandra Turkiewicz and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Junqing XieCentre for Statistics in Medicine and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Victoria Y StraussCentre for Statistics in Medicine and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Daniel Martinez-LagunaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFes), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Carbonell-AbellaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFes), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Adolfo Diez-PerezCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFes), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Xavier NoguesCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFes), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Gary S CollinsCentre for Statistics in Medicine and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sara KhalidCentre for Statistics in Medicine and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Antonella DelmestriCentre for Statistics in Medicine and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Aleksandra TurkiewiczDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Martin EnglundDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Mina TadrousLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carlen ReyesCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFes), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel Prieto-AlhambraCentre for Statistics in Medicine and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol · ESOxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBLund University · SECentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although tramadol is increasingly used to manage chronic noncancer pain, few safety studies have compared it with other opioids. Objective: To assess the associations of tramadol, compared with codeine, with mortality and other adverse clinical outcomes as used in outpatient settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective, population-based, propensity score-matched cohort study using a primary care database with routinely collected medical records and pharmacy dispensations covering more than 80% of the population of Catalonia, Spain (≈6 million people). Patients 18 years or older with 1 or more year of available data and dispensation of tramadol or codeine (2007-2017) were included and followed up to December 31, 2017. Exposures: New prescription dispensation of tramadol or codeine (no dispensation in the previous year). Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes studied were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, fractures, constipation, delirium, falls, opioid abuse/dependence, and sleep disorders within 1 year after the first dispensation. Absolute rate differences (ARDs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using cause-specific Cox models. Results: Of the 1 093 064 patients with a tramadol or codeine dispensation during the study period (326 921 for tramadol, 762 492 for codeine, 3651 for both drugs concomitantly), a total of 368 960 patients (184 480 propensity score-matched pairs) were included after study exclusions and propensity score matching (mean age, 53.1 [SD, 16.1] years; 57.3% women). Compared with codeine, tramadol dispensation was significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (incidence, 13.00 vs 5.61 per 1000 person-years; HR, 2.31 [95% CI, 2.08-2.56]; ARD, 7.37 [95% CI, 6.09-8.78] per 1000 person-years), cardiovascular events (incidence, 10.03 vs 8.67 per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.05-1.27]; ARD, 1.36 [95% CI, 0.45-2.36] per 1000 person-years), and fractures (incidence, 12.26 vs 8.13 per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.37-1.65]; ARD, 4.10 [95% CI, 3.02-5.29] per 1000 person-years). No significant difference was observed for the risk of falls, delirium, constipation, opioid abuse/dependence, or sleep disorders. Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based cohort study, a new prescription dispensation of tramadol, compared with codeine, was significantly associated with a higher risk of subsequent all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and fractures, but there was no significant difference in the risk of constipation, delirium, falls, opioid abuse/dependence, or sleep disorders. The findings should be interpreted cautiously, given the potential for residual confounding.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathAccidental FallsAmbulatory CareAnalgesics, OpioidCardiovascular DiseasesCodeineDatabases, FactualDeliriumDrug PrescriptionsFemaleFractures, BoneHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidCodeineTramadol

Identifiers

PMID34665205
PMCPMC8527363
OpenAlexW3198127956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.