Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34664883›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2021

Immediate family support is important to discharge home for cancer patient with bone metastasis after rehabilitation: A retrospective study.

Ryosuke Ikeguchi, Manabu Nankaku, Rie Yamawaki, Hiroki Tanaka, Ryota Hamada, Takumi Kawano, Masanobu Murao, Gakuto Kitamura, Tatsuya Sato, Toru Nishikawa and 4 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ryosuke IkeguchiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4525-7849
Manabu NankakuRehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Rie YamawakiRehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroki TanakaRehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryota HamadaRehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Takumi KawanoRehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Masanobu MuraoRehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Gakuto KitamuraRehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Tatsuya SatoRehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Toru NishikawaRehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Takashi NoguchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Shinichi KuriyamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Akio SakamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Shuichi MatsudaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe purpose of this study is to investigate the predictive factors of home discharge for rehabilitation patients with cancer bone metastasis.Cancer patients with bone metastasis who underwent rehabilitation between April 2014 and March 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. Data on discharge destination were collected from medical records as outcomes. Multiple regression analyses were carried out to investigate the predictive factors of home discharge.Ninety-eight patients (mean age: 68.6 years, 42 females and 56 males) were included. Fifty patients were discharged home, 38 patients were discharged to other facilities, and 10 patients died. There were no skeletal-related events among these patients during their hospital stay. The receiver-operating curve for the predictive factors for home discharge of the Barthel Index at admission, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status at admission, and number of immediate family members living at home were 60 points (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.74, sensitivity = 0.6400, 1-specificity = 0.2766), 2 score (AUC = 0.65, sensitivity = 0.5400, 1-specificity = 0.2222), and 1 family member (AUC = 0.65, sensitivity = 0.9592, 1-specificity = 0.7222), respectively.In order to plan for cancer patients with bone metastasis to be discharged home, it is important to take into consideration the patients' Barthel Index and Performance Status at the time of hospital admission and the number of immediate family members living at home.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsFamilyFemaleHospitalizationHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPatient DischargeRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34664883
PMCPMC8448050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.