Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34664793›Full record

ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2021

Antibiotic use and associated factors in adult outpatients from 2000 to 2019.

Carlotta Franchi, Sara Mandelli, Ida Fortino, Alessandro Nobili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Appropriateness of the Prescription and Use of Medicines: An Old Concept but More Relevant than Ever.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Urgent-care antibiotic prescribing: An exploratory analysis to evaluate health inequities.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlotta FranchiDepartment of Health Policy, Laboratory of Pharmacoepidemiology and Human Nutrition, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6802-8710
Sara MandelliDepartment of Health Policy, Laboratory of Pharmacoepidemiology and Human Nutrition, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Ida FortinoRegional Health Ministry, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro NobiliDepartment of Health Policy, Laboratory of Pharmacoepidemiology and Human Nutrition, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of the study were to assess the changes in 19-years use of antibiotics (overall, by age, sex and geographical area) and of those classes deemed to be quality indicators for their consumption and to evaluate factors associated to antibiotic use. We analyzed drug prescription data collected in the administrative database of the Lombardy Region (Northern Italy) for outpatients aged 40+ years from 2000 to 2019. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between receiving at least one antibiotic prescription and year of observation, gender, age groups, area of residence, polypharmacy and hospitalizations in the index year. The prevalence of patients prescribed with antibiotics remained high from 2000 (33.8%) to 2019 (32.6%). Prevalence of use of second-line choice antibiotics (penicillin combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors, third and fourth generation cephalosporins, macrolides) continued to increase, only fluoroquinolones decreased in 2019 (19%) comparing to 2018 (26%), at the time when the Italian Medicines Agency promulgated safety warnings. Females (OR 1.28, 95%CI 1.27-1.28), people living in Brescia (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.24-1.25), those exposed to polypharmacy (OR 2.57, 95%CI 2.56-2.57) and those hospitalized 1 to 3 (OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.85-1.86) or more than 3 (OR 2.02, 95%CI 2.01-2.03) times a year had a statistically significant higher risk of receiving antibiotics. The high use of antibiotics over the study period further reinforces the need of impactful interventions, in order to improve the rational use of antibiotics and to reduce the risks of antimicrobial resistance. The differences outlined should be considered when monitoring and planning these interventions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHospitalizationHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPolypharmacyPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticantimicrobial resistancechanges in drug useinappropriate prescriptionquality indicators

Identifiers

PMID34664793
PMCPMC8524672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.