Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34664655›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Frequent but fragmented: use of note templates to document outpatient visits at an academic health center.

Adam Rule, Michelle R Hribar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A fiscally sound, evidenced-based solution to conquering the complexity of physician billing guidelines: A physician-centric note template.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ambient artificial intelligence scribes: utilization and impact on documentation time.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam RuleInformation School, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2441-3320
Michelle R HribarDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN HEALTH INFORMATICST15LM007088 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM R HERSH, Vishnu Mohan · 1992 to 2026
$23.4M
Operationalizing Machine Learning and Discrete Event Simulation Models to Improve Clinic EfficiencyR01LM013426 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HRIBAR, MICHELLE · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
Modeling and Optimization of Clinical Processes Using EHR DataR00LM012238 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HRIBAR, MICHELLE · 2017 to 2019
$672k
NIH HHS R00LM12238NIH HHS R00LM12238, P30EY10572, and T15LM007088NLM NIH HHS R00 LM012238NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013426NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent changes to billing policy have reduced documentation requirements for outpatient notes, providing an opportunity to rethink documentation workflows. While many providers use templates to write notes-whether to insert short phrases or draft entire notes-we know surprisingly little about how these templates are used in practice. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we observed the templates that primary providers and other members of the care team used to write the provider progress note for 2.5 million outpatient visits across 52 specialties at an academic health center between 2018 and 2020. Templates were used to document 89% of visits, with a median of 2 used per visit. Only 17% of the 100 230 unique templates were ever used by more than one person and most providers had their own full-note templates. These findings suggest template use is frequent but fragmented, complicating template revision and maintenance. Reframing template use as a form of computer programming suggests ways to maintain the benefits of personalization while leveraging standardization to reduce documentation burden.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsOutpatientsCross-Sectional StudiesDocumentationHumansRetrospective Studiesclinical documentationelectronic health recordsnote templates

Identifiers

PMID34664655
PMCPMC8714279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.