Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34664612›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2022

18F-MK-6240 tau-PET in genetic frontotemporal dementia.

Jake P Levy, Gleb Bezgin, Melissa Savard, Tharick A Pascoal, Elizabeth Finger, Robert Laforce, Joshua A Sonnen, Jean-Paul Soucy, Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa-Neto and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of reducedEJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of [Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026
    Article
  4. Identifying neuropathologic disease in primary progressive aphasia using narrative speech.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Evaluation of [Research square · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. High resolution autoradiography of [Acta neuropathologica · 2025
    Article
  10. Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025
    Article
  11. Tau PET Imaging With [European journal of neurology · 2025
    Article
  12. Binding adaptability of chemical ligands to polymorphic α-synuclein amyloid fibrils.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Head-to-head comparison of [Acta neuropathologica · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Brain communications · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The Association of Age-Related and Off-Target Retention with Longitudinal Quantification of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  20. Dementia with Lewy bodies: Impact of co-pathologies and implications for clinical trial design.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jake P LevyMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.
Gleb BezginTranslational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1069-9201
Melissa SavardTranslational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.
Tharick A PascoalTranslational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.
Elizabeth FingerDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Robert LaforceClinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire, Département des Sciences Neurologiques du CHU de Québec, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Joshua A SonnenDepartments of Pathology, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jean-Paul SoucyMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.
Serge GauthierTranslational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.
Pedro Rosa-NetoMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.
Simon DucharmeMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7309-1113
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAMcGill University · CAUniversité Laval · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tau is one of several proteins associated with frontotemporal dementia. While knowing which protein is causing a patient's disease is crucial, no biomarker currently exists for identifying tau in vivo in frontotemporal dementia. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential for the promising 18F-MK-6240 PET tracer to bind to tau in vivo in genetic frontotemporal dementia. We enrolled subjects with genetic frontotemporal dementia, who constitute an ideal population for testing because their pathology is already known based on their mutation. Ten participants (three with symptomatic P301L and R406W MAPT mutations expected to show tau binding, three with presymptomatic MAPT mutations and four with non-tau mutations who acted as disease controls) underwent clinical characterization, tau-PET scanning with 18F-MK-6240, amyloid-PET imaging with 18F-NAV-4694 to rule out confounding Alzheimer's pathology, and high-resolution structural MRI. Tau-PET scans of all three symptomatic MAPT carriers demonstrated at least mild 18F-MK-6240 binding in expected regions, with particularly strong binding in a subject with an R406W MAPT mutation (known to be associated with Alzheimer's like neurofibrillary tangles). Two asymptomatic MAPT carriers estimated to be 5 years from disease onset both showed modest 18F-MK-6240 binding, while one ∼30 years from disease onset did not exhibit any binding. Additionally, four individuals with symptomatic frontotemporal dementia caused by a non-tau mutation were scanned (two C9orf72; one GRN; one VCP): 18F-MK-6240 scans were negative for three subjects, while one advanced C9orf72 case showed minimal regionally non-specific binding. All 10 amyloid-PET scans were negative. Furthermore, a general linear model contrasting genetic frontotemporal dementia subjects to a set of 83 age-matched controls showed significant binding only in the MAPT carriers in selected frontal, temporal and subcortical regions. In summary, our findings demonstrate mild but significant binding of MK-6240 in amyloid-negative P301L and R406W MAPT mutation subjects, with higher standardized uptake value ratio in the R406W mutation associated with the presence of NFTs, and little non-specific binding. These results highlight that a positive 18F-MK-6240 tau-PET does not necessarily imply a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and point towards a potential use for 18F-MK-6240 as a biomarker in certain tauopathies beyond Alzheimer's, although further patient recruitment and autopsy studies will be necessary to determine clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseFrontotemporal DementiaC9orf72 ProteinHumansIsoquinolinesMutationNeurofibrillary Tanglestau ProteinsC9orf72 ProteinIsoquinolinesMK-6240tau Proteinsbiomarkersfrontotemporal dementiaPET imaging

Identifiers

PMID34664612
PMCPMC9166561
OpenAlexW3207591034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.