ArticleESC heart failure2021
ARNI versus ACEI/ARB in Reducing Cardiovascular Outcomes after Myocardial Infarction.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- The in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan in acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Current Insights into Pathogenesis and Clinical Management: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Risk Factors for Cardiac Rupture After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Development of a Risk Prediction Model.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Role of NPPB for recovery post ventricular assist device in paediatric dilated cardiomyopathy: Single-cell multiomics.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Inflammasomes as Potential Therapeutic Targets to Prevent Chronic Active Viral Myocarditis-Translating Basic Science into Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Delayed recognition of peripartum cardiomyopathy presenting with severe heart failure: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition on myocardial energy metabolism and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for predicting post-discharge mortality risk in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Enhancing ventricular remodeling and cardiac function in post-acute myocardial infarction with sacubitril/valsartan.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Article
- Coronary Flow Reserve Changes after Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Treatment in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Article
- Review
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor delays progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Effect of dapagliflozin on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2022Article
- Characterization of heart failure patients with reverse left ventricular remodelling post-angiotensin receptor blockers/neprilysin inhibitors therapy.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor therapy and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation: A propensity-matched cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) therapy for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND
resultsData were collected from the Biobank of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between January 2016 and December 2020. A total of 7556 AMI patients were screened for eligibility. Propensity score matching based on age, sex, blood pressure, kidney function, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and cardiovascular medication were conducted, resulting in 291 patients with AMI being assigned to ARNI, ACEI, and ARB group, respectively. Patients receiving ARNI had significantly lower rates of the composite cardiovascular outcome than ACEI {hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.27-0.95], P = 0.02}, and ARB users [HR 0.47, (95%CI, 0.24-0.90), P = 0.02]. Patients receiving ARNI showed lower rates of cardiovascular death than ACEI [HR 0.37, (95%CI, 0.18-0.79), P = 0.01] and ARB users [HR 0.41, (95%CI, 0.18-0.95), P = 0.04]. Subgroup analysis indicated that patients with LVEF no more than 40% tend to benefit more from ARNI as compared with ACEI [HR 0.30, (95%CI, 0.11-0.86), P = 0.01] or ARB [HR 0.21, (95%CI, 0.04-1.1), P = 0.05]. Patients aged no more than 60 years exhibited reduced composite endpoints [HR for ARNI vs. ARB: 0.11, (95%CI, 0.03-0.46), P = 0.002].
conclusionsIn patients with AMI, ARNI was superior to ACEI/ARB in reducing the long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Subgroup analysis further indicates that ARNI is more likely to benefit patients with LVEF less than 40% and aged less than 60 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.