ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2022
Sleep patterns of US healthcare workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Scheduling Is Everything": A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Job and Schedule Satisfaction of Staff Nurses and Nurse Managers.Western journal of nursing research · 2025Article
- Tracking Workplace Violence over 20 Years.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Our New Normal: Pediatric Nurse Residents' Experiences with Transition to Practice during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Reply: SARS-CoV-2 Infection Control and Burnout Prevention Among Healthcare Workers Require Individual and Public Action.Infection & chemotherapy · 2023Article
- Impact of public restrictive measures on hypertension during the COVID-19 pandemic: existing evidence and long-term implications.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Review
- A prospective study of transdiagnostic psychiatric symptoms associated with burnout and functional difficulties in COVID-19 frontline healthcare workers.Journal of psychiatric research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDuring the first few months of the COVID-19 outbreak, healthcare workers (HCW) faced levels of personal risk, emotional distress, and professional strain not seen in their lifetimes. This study described how these stressors influenced various aspects of their sleep patterns.
methodsFrom May 19 to June 20, 2020, an electronic, cross-sectional survey was administered to a convenience sample of in- and outpatient HCW in a large, nonprofit healthcare system. Respondents described the pandemic's initial impact on personal and professional life and various sleep dimensions: regularity, efficiency, duration, timing, quality, and daytime sleepiness.
resultsTwo hundred seven providers responded, representing 17 different healthcare roles. Most (82%) were women with a median age of 39 years (IQR1-3, 31-53). A majority of respondents (81%) worked in an inpatient setting, with half (46%) primarily on the "frontline." Approximately one-third of respondents (37%) were physicians and one-quarter (28%) were nurses. Overall, 68% of HCW reported at least one aspect of sleep worsened during the beginning of the pandemic; the most impacted were daytime sleepiness (increased in 43%) and sleep efficiency (worse in 37%). After adjusting for COVID exposure and burnout, frontline providers had twofold higher odds of poor pandemic sleep, aOR 2.53, 95%CI 1.07-5.99. Among frontline providers, physicians were fivefold more likely to develop poor pandemic sleep compared to nurses (OR 5.73, 95%CI 1.15-28.57).
conclusionsDuring the initial wave of COVID-19, a majority of HCW reported a decline in sleep with an increase in daytime sleepiness and insomnia. Frontline workers, specifically physicians, were at higher risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.