Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34664156›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2022

No coordination required for resources allocation during colony fission in a social insect? An individual-based model reproduces empirical patterns.

François Lavallée, Guillaume Chérel, Thibaud Monnin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

François Lavallée *Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAe, UR LISC, Centre de Clermont-Ferrand, 63178, Aubière, France.
Guillaume Chérel *Complex Systems Institute of Paris Île-de-France, 113 rue Nationale, 75013, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-649X
Thibaud MonninSorbonne Université, Université Paris Est Créteil, Université de Paris, CNRS, INRAe, IRD, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, iEES Paris, 75005, Paris, France. thibaud.monnin@sorbonne-universite.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3762-942X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social insects are classic examples of cooperation and coordination. For instance, laboratory studies of colony relocation, or house-hunting, have investigated how workers coordinate their efforts to swiftly move the colony to the best nesting site available while preserving colony integrity, i.e. avoiding a split. However, several studies have shown that, in some other contexts, individuals may use private rather than social information and may act solitarily rather than in a coordinated way. Here, we study resource allocation by a mature ant colony when it reproduces by fissioning into several colonies. This is a very different task than house hunting in that colony fission seeks the split of the colony. We develop a simple individual-based model to test if colony fission and resource allocation may be carried out by workers acting solitarily with no coordination. Our model reproduces well the pattern of allocation observed in nature (number and size of new colonies). This does not show that workers do not communicate nor coordinate. Rather, it suggests that independent decision making may be an important component of the process of resource allocation.

Indexed as

InsectaSocial BehaviorAnimalsResource AllocationAntsCataglyphis piliscapaDecision makingModel calibrationNetLogoOpenMole

Identifiers

PMID34664156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.