ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2021
Quantifying Vulnerabilities of Single Women and Sexually Transmitted Infections in South Africa (2002-2016): Is It Getting Better (or Worse)?
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) affect millions of people across the world. Besides unacceptably high HIV rates, South Africa also has the highest burden of STIs in the world. The aim of the study was to investigate temporal changes in STI incidence rates using the data from ~ 10,000 women who enrolled in several HIV prevention trials, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (2002-2016). We particularly focused on the changes in distribution of the most influential factors and their population-level impacts on STI incidence rates over time. Characteristics of the women were compared across the study periods: 2002-2004, 2005-2008, 2009-2011, and 2012-2016. Besides multivariable Cox regression models, population attributable risks were calculated for the significant factors. Despite the significant progress in prevention, testing, and treatment programs, infection rates increased substantially from 13.6 to 20.0 per 100 person-year over the study period. Our findings provided a compelling evidence for single/non-cohabiting South African women to be the most vulnerable population who consistently and substantially contributed to increasing STI rates during the 15 years of study duration (PAR%: 44%-47%). We also highlighted the impact of women's lack of knowledge related to their partner, using injectable contraceptives, less parity, and baseline STI positivity which were increased substantially over time. Our findings suggest that a significant proportion of STIs could be prevented by targeting single/non-cohabiting. These results may provide guidance in developing more effective STI prevention programs by targeting women at highest risk of infections and delivering more realistic messages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.