Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34664121›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022

Fluorescence angiography vs. direct palpation for bowel viability evaluation with strangulated bowel obstruction.

Shunjin Ryu, Keigo Hara, Keisuke Goto, Atsuko Okamoto, Takahiro Kitagawa, Rui Marukuchi, Ryusuke Ito, Yukio Nakabayashi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shunjin RyuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center, 180, Nishiaraijuku, Kawaguchi City , Saitama, 333-0833, Japan. systematic.ryu1121@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7484-049X
Keigo HaraDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center, 180, Nishiaraijuku, Kawaguchi City , Saitama, 333-0833, Japan.
Keisuke GotoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center, 180, Nishiaraijuku, Kawaguchi City , Saitama, 333-0833, Japan.
Atsuko OkamotoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center, 180, Nishiaraijuku, Kawaguchi City , Saitama, 333-0833, Japan.
Takahiro KitagawaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center, 180, Nishiaraijuku, Kawaguchi City , Saitama, 333-0833, Japan.
Rui MarukuchiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center, 180, Nishiaraijuku, Kawaguchi City , Saitama, 333-0833, Japan.
Ryusuke ItoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center, 180, Nishiaraijuku, Kawaguchi City , Saitama, 333-0833, Japan.
Yukio NakabayashiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center, 180, Nishiaraijuku, Kawaguchi City , Saitama, 333-0833, Japan.
Noguchi Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn surgery for strangulated bowel obstruction, intestinal blood flow (IBF) is usually evaluated by observing bowel colour, peristalsis, intestinal temperature and arterial pulsations in the mesentery. We investigated whether indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is an effective alternative to palpation.

methodsThirty-eight patients who underwent emergency surgery for strangulated bowel obstruction from January 2017 to April 2021 were divided into two groups: (i) the ICG + group, in which ICG was used during laparoscopic surgery (n = 16), and (ii) the ICG - group, in which palpation without ICG was used during open surgery (n = 22). Starting in July 2019, ICG and laparoscopic surgery were applied in all cases except emergency cases when the fluorescence laparoscope was not ready. Surgical outcomes and patient characteristics were compared.

resultsPatient characteristics, the operative duration and postoperative hospitalization duration did not significantly differ between the groups. Bowel resection was performed in 4 cases (25%) among ICG + patients and 11 cases (50%) among ICG - patients. The ratios of pathological findings (ischaemia:mucosal necrosis:transmural necrosis) were 0:2:2 and 1:6:4 in the two groups, respectively. Blood loss was measured with gauze and suction tubes and was 1 (0-5) mL in the ICG + group and 12.5 (0-73) mL in the ICG - group (p = 0.002). Postoperative complications occurred in 1 case (6.3%) in the ICG + group and 9 cases (40.9%) in the ICG - group (p = 0.025).

conclusionAlthough there were few intestinal resections in the ICG + group, the rate of pathological necrosis tended to be high, and no complications due to ineligibility were noted in the intestinal preservation group. During laparoscopic surgery, ICG-FA is useful as a substitute for palpation and has the potential to improve surgical outcomes. CLINICAL

trial registrationResearch Ethics Committee of the Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center (Saitama, Japan) approval number: 2019-40.

Indexed as

Intestinal ObstructionLaparoscopyFluorescein AngiographyHumansIndocyanine GreenPalpationIndocyanine GreenBowel obstructionBowel viabilityFluorescenceICGLaparoscopic surgeryStrangulation

Identifiers

PMID34664121
OpenAlexW3206920389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.