Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34664110›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2022

Clinical utility of arterial spin labeling perfusion images in the emergency department for the work-up of stroke-like symptoms.

Karen Buch, Reza Hakimelahi, Joseph J Locascio, Divya S Bolar, R Giliberto Gonzalez, Pamela W Schaefer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Arterial Spin Labeling: Key Concepts and Progress Towards Use as a Clinical Tool.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen BuchDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Gray 241 G, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. kbuch@partners.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9579-8921
Reza HakimelahiDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Gray 241 G, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Joseph J LocascioDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Divya S BolarDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
R Giliberto GonzalezDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Gray 241 G, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Pamela W SchaeferDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Gray 241 G, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the utility of ASL in evaluating patients presenting to the ED with stroke-like symptoms.

methodsASL and DWI images from 526 consecutive patients presenting to the ED with acute stroke symptoms were retrospectively reviewed. DWI images were evaluated for volume of restricted diffusion using ABC/2. ASL maps were evaluated for decreased, normal, or increased signal. The volume of decreased ASL signal was calculated using the same ABC/2 technique. The volume of decreased ASL signal was correlated with the volume of DWI signal abnormality to identify cases of mismatch (DWI:ASL ratio > 1.8) and to correlate this mismatch with infarct growth on imaging follow-up. NIHSS, length of hospital stay, mRS, and future admission for acute stroke-like symptoms were recorded. Correlations between ASL abnormalities and clinical parameters were evaluated using a two-tailed t-test.

resultsOf the 526 patients presenting with acute stroke symptoms, 136 patients had an abnormal ASL scan and 388 patients had a normal ASL scan. Of the 136 patients with abnormal ASL, 84 patients had low ASL signal with 79 of these being related to acute infarcts. Elevated ASL signal was seen in 52 patients, of which 30 of these patients had reperfusion hyperemia related to acute infarctions. ASL had a negative predictive value of 94% for evaluating patients with acute ischemic stroke. A subset of patients with abnormal ASL scans with a discharge diagnosis of acute infarction were found to have an ASL:DWI mismatch (ratio > 1.8) and demonstrated significant lesion growth on follow-up imaging (57%). This included some patients who exhibited low ASL signal before development of diffusion restriction (infarction).

conclusionIn patients presenting to the ED with acute stroke symptoms, ASL provides information not available with DWI alone. The NPV of ASL for evaluating patients with acute ischemia was 94%.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaIschemic StrokeStrokeDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEmergency Service, HospitalHumansInfarctionPerfusionRetrospective StudiesSpin LabelsSpin LabelsASLEmergency departmentMRIStroke

Identifiers

PMID34664110
OpenAlexW3206606825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.