Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34664091›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022

Differential role of residual metabolic tumor volume in inoperable stage III NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy ± immune checkpoint inhibition.

Marcus Unterrainer, Julian Taugner, Lukas Käsmann, Amanda Tufman, Niels Reinmuth, Minglun Li, Lena M Mittlmeier, Peter Bartenstein, Wolfgang G Kunz, Jens Ricke and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integration of Circulating Tumor DNA and Metabolic Parameters onAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Metabolic patterns on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marcus UnterrainerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. marcus.unterrainer@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8238-1198
Julian TaugnerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lukas KäsmannDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Amanda TufmanMember of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany.
Niels ReinmuthAsklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany.
Minglun LiDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lena M MittlmeierDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter BartensteinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang G KunzDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Chukwuka EzeDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Farkhad ManapovDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PET-derived metabolic tumor volume (MTV) is an independent prognosticator in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We analyzed the prognostic value of residual MTV (rMTV) after completion of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in inoperable stage III NSCLC patients with and without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI).

methodsFifty-six inoperable stage III NSCLC patients (16 female, median 65.0 years) underwent

resultsOverall, median follow-up was 52.0 months. Smaller rMTV was associated with longer median PFS (29.3 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.015), LPFS (49.9 vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.001), and OS (63.0 vs. 23.0 months, p = 0.003). CRT-IO patients compared to CRT patients showed significantly longer median PFS (29.3 vs. 11.2 months, p = 0.034), LPFS (median not reached vs. 14.0 months, p = 0.016), and OS (median not reached vs. 25.2 months, p = 0.007). In the CRT subgroup, smaller rMTV was associated with longer median PFS (33.5 vs. 8.6 months, p = 0.001), LPFS (49.9 vs. 10.1 months, p = 0.001), and OS (63.0 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.004). In the CRT-IO subgroup, neither PFS, LPFS, nor OS were associated with MTV (p > 0.05 each). The findings were confirmed in subsequent multivariate analyses.

conclusionIn stage III NSCLC, smaller rMTV is highly associated with superior clinical outcome, especially in patients undergoing CRT without ICI. Patients with CRT-IO show significantly improved outcome compared to CRT patients. Of note, clinical outcome in CRT-IO patients is independent of residual MTV. Hence, even patients with large rMTV might profit from ICI despite extensive tumor load.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDisease ProgressionFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleNeoplasm, ResidualPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTumor BurdenFluorodeoxyglucose F18Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsDurvalumabImmunotherapyMetabolic tumor volumeNivolumabNSCLC

Identifiers

PMID34664091
PMCPMC8921088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.