Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663949›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2022

Potential influence of the microbiome environment in patients with biliary tract cancer and implications for therapy.

Roseanna C Wheatley, Elaine Kilgour, Timothy Jacobs, Angela Lamarca, Richard A Hubner, Juan W Valle, Mairéad G McNamara

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oral and Pancreatobiliary Microbiota in Cancer: A Systematic Review of Compositional Alterations and Their Clinical Implications.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Research progress on prognostic factors of gallbladder carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roseanna C WheatleyDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Elaine KilgourCancer Research UK Manchester Institute Cancer Biomarker Centre, University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK.
Timothy JacobsThe Library, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Angela LamarcaDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Richard A HubnerDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Juan W ValleDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-0863
Mairéad G McNamaraDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Mairead.McNamara@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2272-3678
University of Manchester · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary tract cancers, including intra- and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma as well as gallbladder cancer, are associated with poor prognosis and the majority of patients present with advanced-stage, non-resectable disease at diagnosis. Biliary tract cancer may develop through an accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations and can be influenced by microbial exposure. Furthermore, the liver and biliary tract are exposed to the gastrointestinal microbiome through the gut-liver axis. The availability of next-generation sequencing technology has led to an increase in studies investigating the relationship between microbiota and human disease. In particular, the interplay between the microbiome, the tumour micro-environment and response to systemic therapy is a prospering area of interest. Given the poor outcomes for patients with biliary tract cancer, this emerging field of research, through which new biomarkers may be identified, offers potential as a tool for early diagnosis, prognostication or even as a future therapeutic target. This review summarises the available evidence on the microbiome environment in patients with biliary tract cancer, including a discussion around confounding factors, implications for therapy and proposed future directions.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiliary Tract NeoplasmsEpigenesis, GeneticGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPrognosisTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34663949
PMCPMC8888758
OpenAlexW3204443906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.