Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663863›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2021

A systematic review of smartphone-based human activity recognition methods for health research.

Marcin Straczkiewicz, Peter James, Jukka-Pekka Onnela

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcin StraczkiewiczDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. mstraczkiewicz@hsph.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8703-4451
Peter JamesDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Jukka-Pekka OnnelaDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Harvard University · US

Funding

Integrating lifecourse approaches, biologic and digital phenotypes in support of heart and lung disease epidemiologic researchU01HL145386 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI CHAVARRO, JORGE EDUARDO, MANSON, JOANN ELISABETH · 2019 to 2025
$17.8M
Neurodevelopmental Mechanisms Underlying Stress Vulnerability during AdolescenceR37MH119194 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI Katie McLaughlin · 2020 to 2026
$10.6M
Intensive longitudinal study of suicidal behaviors and related health outcomesU01MH116928 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI NOCK, MATTHEW K · 2018 to 2022
$4.3M
Built Environment Assessment through Computer visiON (BEACON): Applying Deep Learning to Street-Level and Satellite Images to Estimate Built Environment Effects on Cardiovascular HealthR01HL150119 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI JAMES, PETER · 2020 to 2024
$3.9M
High Resolution Measures of Behavioral Cancer Risk Factors From Mobile TechnologyR00CA201542 · NCI · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI JAMES, PETER · 2017 to 2019
$747k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA201542NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL150119NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL145386NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH119194NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH116928U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) R00CA201542U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) R01HL150119U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) U01HL145386U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R37MH119194U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) U01MH116928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartphones are now nearly ubiquitous; their numerous built-in sensors enable continuous measurement of activities of daily living, making them especially well-suited for health research. Researchers have proposed various human activity recognition (HAR) systems aimed at translating measurements from smartphones into various types of physical activity. In this review, we summarized the existing approaches to smartphone-based HAR. For this purpose, we systematically searched Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed articles published up to December 2020 on the use of smartphones for HAR. We extracted information on smartphone body location, sensors, and physical activity types studied and the data transformation techniques and classification schemes used for activity recognition. Consequently, we identified 108 articles and described the various approaches used for data acquisition, data preprocessing, feature extraction, and activity classification, identifying the most common practices, and their alternatives. We conclude that smartphones are well-suited for HAR research in the health sciences. For population-level impact, future studies should focus on improving the quality of collected data, address missing data, incorporate more diverse participants and activities, relax requirements about phone placement, provide more complete documentation on study participants, and share the source code of the implemented methods and algorithms.

Identifiers

PMID34663863
PMCPMC8523707
OpenAlexW3207497010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.