Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663805›Full record

ReviewCell death & disease2021

Inhibiting microcephaly genes as alternative to microtubule targeting agents to treat brain tumors.

Giorgia Iegiani, Ferdinando Di Cunto, Gianmarco Pallavicini

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death & disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Research progress of kinesin family in neurological diseases.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Nonviral nanoparticle gene delivery into the CNS for neurological disorders and brain cancer applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giorgia IegianiNeuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi, 10043, Orbassano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2966-9675
Ferdinando Di CuntoNeuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi, 10043, Orbassano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-6357
Gianmarco PallaviciniNeuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi, 10043, Orbassano, Italy. gianmarco.pallavicini@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7735-3010
Neuroscience Institute · IT

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Italian Association for Cancer Research) IG23341Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Italian Foundation for Cancer Research) 24247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medulloblastoma (MB) and gliomas are the most frequent high-grade brain tumors (HGBT) in children and adulthood, respectively. The general treatment for these tumors consists in surgery, followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite the improvement in patient survival, these therapies are only partially effective, and many patients still die. In the last decades, microtubules have emerged as interesting molecular targets for HGBT, as various microtubule targeting agents (MTAs) have been developed and tested pre-clinically and clinically with encouraging results. Nevertheless, these treatments produce relevant side effects since they target microtubules in normal as well as in cancerous cells. A possible strategy to overcome this toxicity could be to target proteins that control microtubule dynamics but are required by HGBT cells much more than in normal cell types. The genes mutated in primary hereditary microcephaly (MCPH) are ubiquitously expressed in proliferating cells, but under normal conditions are selectively required during brain development, in neural progenitors. There is evidence that MB and glioma cells share molecular profiles with progenitors of cerebellar granules and of cortical radial glia cells, in which MCPH gene functions are fundamental. Moreover, several studies indicate that MCPH genes are required for HGBT expansion. Among the 25 known MCPH genes, we focus this review on KNL1, ASPM, CENPE, CITK and KIF14, which have been found to control microtubule stability during cell division. We summarize the current knowledge about the molecular basis of their interaction with microtubules. Moreover, we will discuss data that suggest these genes are promising candidates as HGBT-specific targets.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisBrain NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicCytokinesisHumansMicrocephalyMicrotubules

Identifiers

PMID34663805
PMCPMC8523548
OpenAlexW3205571391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.