Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663657›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Coronary CT angiography for improved assessment of patients with acute chest pain and low-range positive high-sensitivity troponins: study protocol for a prospective, observational, multicentre study (COURSE trial).

Murat Arslan, Jeroen Schaap, Bart Van Gorsel, Ricardo Pj Budde, Sebastiaan Cam Bekkers, Yvonne Jm Van Cauteren, Peter Damman, Jesse Habets, Eric A Dubois, Admir Dedic

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03129659 (Coronary CT Angiography for Improved Assessment of Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome With Inconclusive Diagnostic Work-up), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03129659 naunknown statusnot on this map

Coronary CT Angiography for Improved Assessment of Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome With Inconclusive Diagnostic Work-up

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2018 to 2022Enrolled230ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, Chest PainArmsCoronary CT Angiography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Role of CT and MRI in Cardiac Emergencies.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022
    Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Murat ArslanCardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands m.arslan@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8218-6077
Jeroen SchaapCardiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Bart Van GorselCardiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Ricardo Pj BuddeCardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan Cam BekkersCardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Yvonne Jm Van CauterenCardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Peter DammanCardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jesse HabetsRadiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eric A DuboisCardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Admir DedicCardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent evaluation of patients suspected of a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) involves the use of algorithms that incorporate clinical information, electrocardiogram (ECG) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponins (hs-troponins). While primarily designed to rule out NSTE-ACS safely, these algorithms can also be used for rule in of NSTE-ACS in some patients. Still, in a substantial number of patients, these algorithms do not provide a conclusive work-up. These patients often present with an atypical clinical profile and low-range positive hs-troponin values without a characteristic rise or fall pattern. They represent a heterogeneous group of patients with various underlying conditions; only a fraction (30%-40%) will eventually be diagnosed with a myocardial infarction. Uncertainty exists about the optimal diagnostic strategy and their management depends on the clinical perspective of the treating physician ranging from direct discharge to admission for invasive coronary angiography. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is a non-invasive test that has been shown to be safe, fast and reliable in the evaluation of coronary artery disease. In this study, we will determine the usefulness of CCTA in patients with acute chest pain and low-range positive hs-troponin values. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective, double-blind, observational, multicentre study conducted in the Netherlands. Patients aged 30-80 years presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain and a suspicion of NSTE-ACS, a normal or non-diagnostic ECG and low-range positive hs-troponins will be scheduled to undergo CCTA. The primary outcome is the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA for the diagnosis of NSTE-ACS at discharge, in terms of sensitivity and negative predictive value. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands (registration number MEC-2017-506). Written informed consent to participate will be obtained from all participants. This study's findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03129659).

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeTroponinBiomarkersChest PainComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersTroponincardiologycardiovascular imagingcoronary heart diseasemyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID34663657
PMCPMC8524275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.