Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663627›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

The Extent of Task Specificity for Visual and Tactile Sequences in the Auditory Cortex of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.

M Zimmermann, P Mostowski, P Rutkowski, P Tomaszewski, P Krzysztofiak, K Jednoróg, A Marchewka, M Szwed

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural adaptations to congenital deafness: enhanced tactile discrimination through cross-modal neural plasticity - an fMRI study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

M ZimmermannInstitute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, 30-060 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1715-0147
P MostowskiSection for Sign Linguistics, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.
P RutkowskiSection for Sign Linguistics, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.
P TomaszewskiPolish Sign Language and Deaf Communication Research Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland.
P KrzysztofiakFaculty of Psychology, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 03-815 Warsaw, Poland.
K JednorógLaboratory of Language Neurobiology, Nencki Institute for Experimental Biology, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
A MarchewkaLaboratory of Brain Imaging, Nencki Institute for Experimental Biology, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
M SzwedInstitute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, 30-060 Krakow, Poland mfszwed@gmail.com.
Center for Applied Linguistics · USInstytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego · PLJagiellonian University · PLFoundation for Polish Science · PLUniwersytet SWPS · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been proposed that the auditory cortex in the deaf humans might undergo task-specific reorganization. However, evidence remains scarce as previous experiments used only two very specific tasks (temporal processing and face perception) in visual modality. Here, congenitally deaf/hard of hearing and hearing women and men were enrolled in an fMRI experiment as we sought to fill this evidence gap in two ways. First, we compared activation evoked by a temporal processing task performed in two different modalities, visual and tactile. Second, we contrasted this task with a perceptually similar task that focuses on the spatial dimension. Additional control conditions consisted of passive stimulus observation. In line with the task specificity hypothesis, the auditory cortex in the deaf was activated by temporal processing in both visual and tactile modalities. This effect was selective for temporal processing relative to spatial discrimination. However, spatial processing also led to significant auditory cortex recruitment which, unlike temporal processing, occurred even during passive stimulus observation. We conclude that auditory cortex recruitment in the deaf and hard of hearing might involve interplay between task-selective and pluripotential mechanisms of cross-modal reorganization. Our results open several avenues for the investigation of the full complexity of the cross-modal plasticity phenomenon.

Indexed as

Hearing DisordersAuditory CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuronal PlasticityPhotic StimulationPhysical StimulationSpatial ProcessingTime PerceptionTouch PerceptionVisual Perceptionauditory cortexcross-modal perceptiondeaffMRIplasticity

Identifiers

PMID34663627
PMCPMC8612642
OpenAlexW3206147290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.