Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663549›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of preventive medicine2022

Community Health Centers' Performance in Cancer Screening and Prevention.

Nathalie Huguet, Tahlia Hodes, Heather Holderness, Steffani R Bailey, Jennifer E DeVoe, Miguel Marino

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Cancer and Health Inequalities.British journal of cancer · 2026
    Review
  6. Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among African American Patients of North Florida Community Health Centers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  7. Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention among Latinas in the United States among a Network of Community Health Centers.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Impacts of pragmatic implementation science in a primary care laboratory.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathalie HuguetDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Tahlia HodesDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Heather HoldernessDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: holdernh@ohsu.edu.
Steffani R BaileyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jennifer E DeVoeDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Biostatistics Group, School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

Research ProgramP50CA244289 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GOLD, RACHEL · 2019 to 2023
$7.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLittle is known about what clinic-level factors differentiate community health centers that achieve high performance on cancer-preventive care metrics. This study aims to describe the longitudinal trends in the delivery of 3 cancer-preventive care metrics (cervical and colorectal cancer screenings and tobacco-cessation intervention) and define and compare community health centers with high cancer-preventive care performance with those with low cancer-preventive care performance.

methodsThis observational study used 2012-2019 community health center data (N=933) from the Uniform Data System. High/low performance was based on Healthy People 2020 targets and sample distribution. For each cancer-preventive care metric, the percentage of community health centers that met high (≥70.5% at cervical or colorectal cancer screening or >80% tobacco-cessation intervention) and low thresholds at 1, 2, and all the 3 screenings was estimated. Multivariable generalized estimating equations logistic regression modeling was used to assess the community health center‒level factors associated with screening performance.

resultsThe community health centers' performance for tobacco-cessation intervention remained at ≥80%, with a small increase over time. Performance for cervical cancer screening remained unchanged with about 50% of patients screened. Colorectal cancer screening performance increased from around 30% in 2012 to 44% in 2019. Very few community health centers reached high performance (3%) in all the 3 indicators, and 13% of community health centers were high in any 2 of the outcomes in 2019. Higher patient volume, a greater proportion of Hispanic patients, fewer uninsured patients, and community health centers located in the Northeast region were associated with high performance in 2019.

conclusionsVery few community health centers meet all Healthy People 2020 goals in cancer screenings and may struggle to achieve the 2030 goals. Very few indicators differentiated high performers from low performers.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCommunity Health CentersEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMedically Uninsured

Identifiers

PMID34663549
PMCPMC8748316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.