Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663440›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2021

A deep learning method for predicting knee osteoarthritis radiographic progression from MRI.

Jean-Baptiste Schiratti, Rémy Dubois, Paul Herent, David Cahané, Jocelyn Dachary, Thomas Clozel, Gilles Wainrib, Florence Keime-Guibert, Agnes Lalande, Maria Pueyo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Advances in deep learning multimodal fusion for early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jean-Baptiste Schiratti *Owkin, 12 Rue Martel, 75010, Paris, France.
Rémy Dubois *Owkin, 12 Rue Martel, 75010, Paris, France.
Paul HerentOwkin, 12 Rue Martel, 75010, Paris, France.
David CahanéOwkin, 12 Rue Martel, 75010, Paris, France.
Jocelyn DacharyOwkin, 12 Rue Martel, 75010, Paris, France.
Thomas ClozelOwkin, 12 Rue Martel, 75010, Paris, France.
Gilles WainribOwkin, 12 Rue Martel, 75010, Paris, France.
Florence Keime-GuibertServier, Research and Development, 50 rue Carnot, 92284, Suresnes Cedex, France.
Agnes LalandeServier, Research and Development, 50 rue Carnot, 92284, Suresnes Cedex, France.
Maria PueyoServier, Research and Development, 50 rue Carnot, 92284, Suresnes Cedex, France.
Romain GuillierServier, Research and Development, 50 rue Carnot, 92284, Suresnes Cedex, France.
Christine GabarrocaServier, Research and Development, 50 rue Carnot, 92284, Suresnes Cedex, France.
Philippe MoingeonServier, Research and Development, 50 rue Carnot, 92284, Suresnes Cedex, France. philippe.moingeon@servier.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2380-9983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe identification of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) likely to progress rapidly in terms of structure is critical to facilitate the development of disease-modifying drugs.

methodsUsing 9280 knee magnetic resonance (MR) images (3268 patients) from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database , we implemented a deep learning method to predict, from MR images and clinical variables including body mass index (BMI), further cartilage degradation measured by joint space narrowing at 12 months.

resultsUsing COR IW TSE images, our classification model achieved a ROC AUC score of 65%. On a similar task, trained radiologists obtained a ROC AUC score of 58.7% highlighting the difficulty of the classification task. Additional analyses conducted in parallel to predict pain grade evaluated by the WOMAC pain index achieved a ROC AUC score of 72%. Attention maps provided evidence for distinct specific areas as being relevant in those two predictive models, including the medial joint space for JSN progression and the intra-articular space for pain prediction.

conclusionsThis feasibility study demonstrates the interest of deep learning applied to OA, with a potential to support even trained radiologists in the challenging task of identifying patients with a high-risk of disease progression.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularDeep LearningOsteoarthritis, KneeDisease ProgressionHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID34663440
PMCPMC8521982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.