Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663439›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Optimization of sepsis therapy based on patient-specific digital precision diagnostics using next generation sequencing (DigiSep-Trial)-study protocol for a randomized, controlled, interventional, open-label, multicenter trial.

Thorsten Brenner, Annabell Skarabis, Philip Stevens, Jennifer Axnick, Peter Haug, Silke Grumaz, Thomas Bruckner, Steffen Luntz, Oliver Witzke, Mathias W Pletz and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04571801 (Optimization of Sepsis Therapy Based on Patient-specific Digital Precision Diagnostics), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04571801 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Optimization of Sepsis Therapy Based on Patient-specific Digital Precision Diagnostics

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, EssenRan2022 to 2024Enrolled410ConditionsSepsis, Septic ShockArmsStandard diagnostics, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Detection of pathogenic microorganisms using metagenomic next generation sequencing for patients with suspected infection presenting in the emergency department.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Desirability of outcome ranking and quality life measurement for antimicrobial research in organ transplantation.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Thorsten BrennerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Essen University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. thorsten.brenner@uk-essen.de.
Annabell SkarabisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Essen University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Philip StevensNoscendo GmbH, Königstraße 34, 47198, Duisburg, Germany.
Jennifer AxnickNoscendo GmbH, Königstraße 34, 47198, Duisburg, Germany.
Peter HaugNoscendo GmbH, Königstraße 34, 47198, Duisburg, Germany.
Silke GrumazNoscendo GmbH, Königstraße 34, 47198, Duisburg, Germany.
Thomas BrucknerInstitute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Steffen LuntzCoordination Centre for Clinical Trials (KKS), Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Oliver WitzkeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Mathias W PletzCenter for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Thomas M RuprechtTechniker Krankenkasse, Bramfelder Str. 140, 22305, Hamburg, Germany.
Ursula MarschallBARMER, Lichtscheider Str. 89, 42285, Wuppertal, Germany.
Sibel AltinAOK Rheinland/Hamburg, Kasernenstr. 61, 40213, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Wolfgang GreinerHealth Economics and Health Care Management, Bielefeld University, P.O. Box 10 01 31, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany.
Marc Moritz BergerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Essen University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6771-3193
TIFOnet Critical Care Trials Group
Essen University Hospital · DEHeidelberg University · DEBARMER GEK · DEBielefeld University · DEJena University Hospital · DETechniker Krankenkasse (Germany) · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee NVF1_2020-060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is triggered by an infection and represents one of the greatest challenges of modern intensive care medicine. With regard to a targeted antimicrobial treatment strategy, the earliest possible pathogen detection is of crucial importance. Until now, culture-based detection methods represent the diagnostic gold standard, although they are characterized by numerous limitations. Culture-independent molecular diagnostic procedures represent a promising alternative. In particular, the plasmatic detection of circulating, cell-free DNA by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has shown to be suitable for identifying disease-causing pathogens in patients with bloodstream infections.

methodsThe DigiSep-Trial is a randomized, controlled, interventional, open-label, multicenter trial characterizing the effect of the combination of NGS-based digital precision diagnostics with standard-of-care microbiological analyses compared to solely standard-of-care microbiological analyses in the clinical picture of sepsis/septic shock. Additional anti-infective expert consultations are provided for both study groups. In 410 patients (n = 205 per arm) with sepsis/septic shock, the study examines whether the so-called DOOR-RADAR (Desirability of Outcome Ranking/Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk) score (representing a combined endpoint including the criteria (1) intensive/intermediate care unit length of stay, (2) consumption of antibiotics, (3) mortality, and (4) acute kidney injury (AKI)) can be improved by an additional NGS-based diagnostic concept. We also aim to investigate the cost-effectiveness of this new diagnostic procedure. It is postulated that intensive/intermediate care unit length of stay, mortality rate, incidence of AKI, the duration of antimicrobial therapy as well as the costs caused by complications and outpatient aftercare can be reduced. Moreover, a significant improvement in patient's quality of life is expected. DISCUSSION: The authors´ previous work suggests that NGS-based diagnostics have a higher specificity and sensitivity compared to standard-of-care microbiological analyses for detecting bloodstream infections. In combination with the here presented DigiSep-Trial, this work provides the optimal basis to establish a new NGS-driven concept as part of the national standard based on the best possible evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: DRKS-ID DRKS00022782 . Registered on August 25, 2020 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04571801 . Registered October 1, 2020.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearchBacteremiaBlood cultureDesirability of Outcome Ranking/Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk (DOOR/RADAR) scoreDigital precision diagnosticsNext generation sequencingSepsis

Identifiers

PMID34663439
PMCPMC8522064
OpenAlexW3206537156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.