ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2021
Quantitative assessment of velocity and flow using compressed SENSE in children and young adults with adequate acquired temporal resolution.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Highly accelerated free-breathing real-time 2D flow imaging using compressed sensing and shared velocity encoding.European radiology · 2024Article
- Impact of compressed sensing (CS) acceleration of two-dimensional (2D) flow sequences in clinical paediatric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Comparison of 2D and 4D Flow MRI in Neonates Without General Anesthesia.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Article
- The Role of Circulating Collagen Turnover Biomarkers and Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Patients with Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhase contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with parallel imaging acceleration is established and validated for measuring velocity and flow. However, additional acceleration to further shorten acquisition times would be beneficial in patients with complex vasculature who need multiple PC-CMR measurements, especially pediatric patients with higher heart rates.
methodsPC-CMR images acquired with compressed sensitivity encoding (C-SENSE) factors of 3 to 6 and standard of care PC-CMR with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) factor of 2 (S2) acquired as part of clinical CMR examinations performed between November 2020 and January 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The velocity and flow through the ascending aorta (AAo), descending aorta (DAo), and superior vena cava (SVC) in a transverse plane at the level of pulmonary artery bifurcation were compared. Additionally, frequency power distribution and dynamic time warp distance were calculated for these acquisitions. To further validate the adequate temporal resolution requirement, patients with S2 PC-CMR in the same acquisition plane were added in frequency power distribution analysis.
resultsTwenty-eight patients (25 males; 15.9 ± 1.9 years; body surface area (BSA) 1.7 ± 0.2 m
conclusionsStroke volume, cardiac output, and mean peak velocity measurements using PC-CMR with C-SENSE of up to 6 agree with measurements by standard of care PC-CMR with SENSE = 2 and resulted in up to a 65% reduction in acquisition time. Adequate temporal sampling can be ensured by acquiring 20 cardiac phases throughout the entire cardiac cycle over a wide range of pediatric and young adult heart rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.