Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663276›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Privacy protection of medical data in social network.

Jie Su, Yi Cao, Yuehui Chen, Yahui Liu, Jinming Song

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jie SuSchool of Information Science and Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan, 250022, China. ise_suj@ujn.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4639-6787
Yi CaoSchool of Information Science and Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan, 250022, China.
Yuehui ChenSchool of Information Science and Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan, 250022, China.
Yahui LiuSchool of Information Management, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing, China.
Jinming SongDepartment of Hematopathology and Lab Medicines, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
University of Jinan · CNBeijing Information Science & Technology University · CNMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtection of privacy data published in the health care field is an important research field. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the USA is the current legislation for privacy protection. However, the Institute of Medicine Committee on Health Research and the Privacy of Health Information recently concluded that HIPAA cannot adequately safeguard the privacy, while at the same time researchers cannot use the medical data for effective researches. Therefore, more effective privacy protection methods are urgently needed to ensure the security of released medical data.

methodsPrivacy protection methods based on clustering are the methods and algorithms to ensure that the published data remains useful and protected. In this paper, we first analyzed the importance of the key attributes of medical data in the social network. According to the attribute function and the main objective of privacy protection, the attribute information was divided into three categories. We then proposed an algorithm based on greedy clustering to group the data points according to the attributes and the connective information of the nodes in the published social network. Finally, we analyzed the loss of information during the procedure of clustering, and evaluated the proposed approach with respect to classification accuracy and information loss rates on a medical dataset.

resultsThe associated social network of a medical dataset was analyzed for privacy preservation. We evaluated the values of generalization loss and structure loss for different values of k and a, i.e. [Formula: see text] = {3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30}, a = {0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1}. The experimental results in our proposed approach showed that the generalization loss approached optimal when a = 1 and k = 21, and structure loss approached optimal when a = 0.4 and k = 3.

conclusionWe showed the importance of the attributes and the structure of the released health data in privacy preservation. Our method achieved better results of privacy preservation in social network by optimizing generalization loss and structure loss. The proposed method to evaluate loss obtained a balance between the data availability and the risk of privacy leakage.

Indexed as

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability ActPrivacyAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisConfidentialityHumansSocial NetworkingUnited StatesClusterK-anonymityMedical dataPrivacy protection

Identifiers

PMID34663276
PMCPMC8524799
OpenAlexW3206478716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.