Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663260›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Artificial intelligence-supported lung cancer detection by multi-institutional readers with multi-vendor chest radiographs: a retrospective clinical validation study.

Daiju Ueda, Akira Yamamoto, Akitoshi Shimazaki, Shannon Leigh Walston, Toshimasa Matsumoto, Nobuhiro Izumi, Takuma Tsukioka, Hiroaki Komatsu, Hidetoshi Inoue, Daijiro Kabata and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daiju UedaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan. ai.labo.ocu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-3616
Akira YamamotoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Akitoshi ShimazakiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Shannon Leigh WalstonDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Toshimasa MatsumotoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Nobuhiro IzumiDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Takuma TsukiokaDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroaki KomatsuDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Hidetoshi InoueDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Daijiro KabataDepartment of Medical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Noritoshi NishiyamaDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Yukio MikiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated the performance improvement of physicians with varying levels of chest radiology experience when using a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-assisted detection (CAD) software to detect lung cancer nodules on chest radiographs from multiple vendors.

methodsChest radiographs and their corresponding chest CT were retrospectively collected from one institution between July 2017 and June 2018. Two author radiologists annotated pathologically proven lung cancer nodules on the chest radiographs while referencing CT. Eighteen readers (nine general physicians and nine radiologists) from nine institutions interpreted the chest radiographs. The readers interpreted the radiographs alone and then reinterpreted them referencing the CAD output. Suspected nodules were enclosed with a bounding box. These bounding boxes were judged correct if there was significant overlap with the ground truth, specifically, if the intersection over union was 0.3 or higher. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of the readers' assessments were calculated.

resultsIn total, 312 chest radiographs were collected as a test dataset, including 59 malignant images (59 nodules of lung cancer) and 253 normal images. The model provided a modest boost to the reader's sensitivity, particularly helping general physicians. The performance of general physicians was improved from 0.47 to 0.60 for sensitivity, from 0.96 to 0.97 for specificity, from 0.87 to 0.90 for accuracy, from 0.75 to 0.82 for PPV, and from 0.89 to 0.91 for NPV while the performance of radiologists was improved from 0.51 to 0.60 for sensitivity, from 0.96 to 0.96 for specificity, from 0.87 to 0.90 for accuracy, from 0.76 to 0.80 for PPV, and from 0.89 to 0.91 for NPV. The overall increase in the ratios of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV were 1.22 (1.14-1.30), 1.00 (1.00-1.01), 1.03 (1.02-1.04), 1.07 (1.03-1.11), and 1.02 (1.01-1.03) by using the CAD, respectively.

conclusionThe AI-based CAD was able to improve the ability of physicians to detect nodules of lung cancer in chest radiographs. The use of a CAD model can indicate regions physicians may have overlooked during their initial assessment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDeep LearningFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, ThoracicRadiologistsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceChest radiographyComputer-assisted detectionDeep learningLung CancerModel validation

Identifiers

PMID34663260
PMCPMC8524996
OpenAlexW3205499610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.