ArticleBMC cancer2021
Artificial intelligence-supported lung cancer detection by multi-institutional readers with multi-vendor chest radiographs: a retrospective clinical validation study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unassisted Clinicians Versus Deep Learning-Assisted Clinicians in Image-Based Cancer Diagnostics: Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Lung Cancer: Advances in Imaging, Detection, and Prognosis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of AI in chest radiography for pneumonia and lung cancer: A meta-analysis.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Clinical utility of artificial intelligence models in radiology: a systemic scoping review of diagnostic and endovascular applications.CVIR endovascular · 2025Review
- What Is Fair? Defining Fairness in Machine Learning for Health.Statistics in medicine · 2025Review
- Biomarkers for the diagnosis of indeterminate pulmonary nodules: are we there yet?Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Recent trends in scientific research in chest radiology: What to do or not to do? That is the critical question in research.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- A Systematic Review: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening in Detecting Lung Nodules on Chest X-Rays.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted radiology assessment of cancer: a systematic review.BJR artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Educational insights of artificial intelligence assisted chest radiograph interpretation in lung cancer detection-pictorial review.BJR artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of artificial intelligence for detecting operable lung cancer on chest radiographs.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Explainable deep-neural-network supported scheme for tuberculosis detection from chest radiographs.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence Replace Humans for Detecting Lung Tumors on Radiographs? An Examination of Resected Malignant Lung Tumors.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of AI-assisted CXR analysis in detecting incidental lung nodules and lung cancers in non-respiratory outpatient clinics.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Application value of a computer-aided diagnosis and management system for the detection of lung nodules.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Implementation of artificial intelligence in thoracic imaging-a what, how, and why guide from the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI).European radiology · 2023Review
- Frequency of Missed Findings on Chest Radiographs (CXRs) in an International, Multicenter Study: Application of AI to Reduce Missed Findings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe investigated the performance improvement of physicians with varying levels of chest radiology experience when using a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-assisted detection (CAD) software to detect lung cancer nodules on chest radiographs from multiple vendors.
methodsChest radiographs and their corresponding chest CT were retrospectively collected from one institution between July 2017 and June 2018. Two author radiologists annotated pathologically proven lung cancer nodules on the chest radiographs while referencing CT. Eighteen readers (nine general physicians and nine radiologists) from nine institutions interpreted the chest radiographs. The readers interpreted the radiographs alone and then reinterpreted them referencing the CAD output. Suspected nodules were enclosed with a bounding box. These bounding boxes were judged correct if there was significant overlap with the ground truth, specifically, if the intersection over union was 0.3 or higher. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of the readers' assessments were calculated.
resultsIn total, 312 chest radiographs were collected as a test dataset, including 59 malignant images (59 nodules of lung cancer) and 253 normal images. The model provided a modest boost to the reader's sensitivity, particularly helping general physicians. The performance of general physicians was improved from 0.47 to 0.60 for sensitivity, from 0.96 to 0.97 for specificity, from 0.87 to 0.90 for accuracy, from 0.75 to 0.82 for PPV, and from 0.89 to 0.91 for NPV while the performance of radiologists was improved from 0.51 to 0.60 for sensitivity, from 0.96 to 0.96 for specificity, from 0.87 to 0.90 for accuracy, from 0.76 to 0.80 for PPV, and from 0.89 to 0.91 for NPV. The overall increase in the ratios of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV were 1.22 (1.14-1.30), 1.00 (1.00-1.01), 1.03 (1.02-1.04), 1.07 (1.03-1.11), and 1.02 (1.01-1.03) by using the CAD, respectively.
conclusionThe AI-based CAD was able to improve the ability of physicians to detect nodules of lung cancer in chest radiographs. The use of a CAD model can indicate regions physicians may have overlooked during their initial assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.