Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663247›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and preceding risk factors: a cross-sectional study from Nashik District, India.

Prakash Prabhakarrao Doke, Sonali Hemant Palkar, Jayashree Sachin Gothankar, Archana Vasantrao Patil, Amruta Paresh Chutke, Prasad Dnyandeo Pore, Aniruddha Vinayakrao Deshpande, Khanindra Kumar Bhuyan, Madhusudan Vamanrao Karnataki, Aparna Nishikant Shrotri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study of Abortions in a Rural Area of Delhi.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Prakash Prabhakarrao DokeDepartment of Community Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College, Pune-Satara Road, Pune, Maharashtra, 411043, India.
Sonali Hemant PalkarDepartment of Community Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College, Pune-Satara Road, Pune, Maharashtra, 411043, India. palkarsh@gmail.com.
Jayashree Sachin GothankarDepartment of Community Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College, Pune-Satara Road, Pune, Maharashtra, 411043, India.
Archana Vasantrao PatilState Family Welfare Bureau, Department of Public Health, Government of Maharashtra, Pune, India.
Amruta Paresh ChutkeDepartment of Community Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College, Pune-Satara Road, Pune, Maharashtra, 411043, India.
Prasad Dnyandeo PoreDepartment of Community Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College, Pune-Satara Road, Pune, Maharashtra, 411043, India.
Aniruddha Vinayakrao DeshpandeState Family Welfare Bureau, Department of Public Health, Government of Maharashtra, Pune, India.
Khanindra Kumar BhuyanUNICEF Maharashtra, Mumbai, India.
Madhusudan Vamanrao KarnatakiUNICEF Maharashtra, Mumbai, India.
Aparna Nishikant ShrotriUNICEF Maharashtra, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe preconception phase of women's life cycle is critical but comparatively ignored. The presence of health risks is judged as hazardous to the wellbeing of women and their offspring. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of various pregnancy outcomes and assess the association between certain risk factors and adverse outcomes.

methodsAs a part of a preconception care intervention project, a baseline survey was conducted in four blocks of Nashik District, India. In this population-based cross-sectional analytical study, we compared cases in the study group (randomly selected one tribal and one non-tribal block) with those of the control group (one tribal and one non-tribal block). A comparison was also made between the tribal and non-tribal blocks in each group. All women who had a pregnancy outcome in the preceding 12 months (01 April 2017 to 31 March 2018) were interviewed. Trained Accredited Social Health Activists conducted the survey under the direct supervision of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives and Medical Officers. Multivariate analysis was carried out to find the adjusted prevalence ratio of having a particular adverse outcome because of the prespecified potential risk factors.

resultsA total of 9307 women participated in the study. The prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was as follows: abortion in 4.1%, stillbirth in 1.7%, preterm birth in 4.1%, low birth weight in 13.2%, and congenital physical defect in 2.8%. Prevalence of parental consanguinity, pre-existing maternal illness at conception, heavy work during the last six months of pregnancy, tobacco consumption, alcohol consumption, direct exposure to pesticides and domestic violence during pregnancy was 18.5, 2.2, 18.7, 5.6, 0.5, 2.3, and 0.8% respectively. Risk factors associated with abortion included pre-existing illness and heavy work in the last six months of the pregnancy. Consanguinity, tobacco consumption during pregnancy and pre-existing illness were identified as risk factors for stillbirth. Significant risk factors of low birth weight were heavy work in the last six months of pregnancy, pre-existing illness and residence in a tribal area.

conclusionThere is a need to emphasize on maternal behaviour, including tobacco consumption, and heavy work during pregnancy, as well as on parental consanguinity and pre-existing maternal illnesses, in order to achieve the best possible pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAbortion, SpontaneousCongenital AbnormalitiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaInfant, Low Birth WeightPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthPrevalenceRisk FactorsStillbirthAbortionAdverse pregnancy outcomesCongenital physical defectLow birth weightRisk factorsStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID34663247
PMCPMC8522067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.