Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663243›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Clinical added value of MRI to CT in patients scheduled for local therapy of colorectal liver metastases (CAMINO): study protocol for an international multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

B Görgec, I Hansen, G Kemmerich, T Syversveen, M Abu Hilal, E J T Belt, R H C Bisschops, T L Bollen, K Bosscha, M C Burgmans and 33 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

43 authors at 19 institutions in 4 countries.

B GörgecDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-3290
I HansenDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
G KemmerichDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
T SyversveenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
M Abu HilalDepartment of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
E J T BeltDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
R H C BisschopsDepartment of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
T L BollenDepartment of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
K BosschaDepartment of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
M C BurgmansDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
V CappendijkDepartment of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
M T De BoerDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
M D'HondtDepartment of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium.
B EdwinDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
H GielkensDepartment of Radiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
D J GrünhagenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
P GillardinDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
P D GobardhanDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
H H HartgrinkDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
K HorsthuisDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
N F M KokDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P A M KintDepartment of Radiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
J W H KruimerDepartment of Radiology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
W K G LeclercqDepartment of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
D J LipsDepartment of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
B LutinDepartment of Radiology, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium.
M MaasDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H A MarsmanDepartment of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M MoroneDepartment of Radiology, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
J P PenningsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J PeringaDepartment of Radiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W W Te RieleDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
M VermaasDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.
D WichertsDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
F E J A WillemssenDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
B M ZonderhuisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P M M BossuytDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R J SwijnenburgDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Å A FretlandDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
C Verhoef *Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M G Besselink *Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Stoker *Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.stoker@amsterdamumc.nl.
CAMINO Study Group
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC · NLOslo University Hospital · NOZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg · BEAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLAZ Groeninge · BEFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLOLVG · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLIJsselland Ziekenhuis · NLLeiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

kwf kankerbestrijding 11916 / 2018-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbdominal computed tomography (CT) is the standard imaging method for patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in the diagnostic workup for surgery or thermal ablation. Diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic-acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver is increasingly used to improve the detection rate and characterization of liver lesions. MRI is superior in detection and characterization of CRLM as compared to CT. However, it is unknown how MRI actually impacts patient management. The primary aim of the CAMINO study is to evaluate whether MRI has sufficient clinical added value to be routinely added to CT in the staging of CRLM. The secondary objective is to identify subgroups who benefit the most from additional MRI.

methodsIn this international multicentre prospective incremental diagnostic accuracy study, 298 patients with primary or recurrent CRLM scheduled for curative liver resection or thermal ablation based on CT staging will be enrolled from 17 centres across the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, and Italy. All study participants will undergo CT and diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic-acid enhanced MRI prior to local therapy. The local multidisciplinary team will provide two local therapy plans: first, based on CT-staging and second, based on both CT and MRI. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of clinically significant CRLM (CS-CRLM) detected by MRI not visible on CT. CS-CRLM are defined as liver lesions leading to a change in local therapeutical management. If MRI detects new CRLM in segments which would have been resected in the original operative plan, these are not considered CS-CRLM. It is hypothesized that MRI will lead to the detection of CS-CRLM in ≥10% of patients which is considered the minimal clinically important difference. Furthermore, a prediction model will be developed using multivariable logistic regression modelling to evaluate the predictive value of patient, tumor and procedural variables on finding CS-CRLM on MRI. DISCUSSION: The CAMINO study will clarify the clinical added value of MRI to CT in patients with CRLM scheduled for local therapy. This study will provide the evidence required for the implementation of additional MRI in the routine work-up of patients with primary and recurrent CRLM for local therapy.

trial registrationThe CAMINO study was registered in the Netherlands National Trial Register under number NL8039 on September 20th 2019.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAAbdominal CT scanColorectal cancerColorectal liver metastasesDiffusion weighted imagingGadoxetic acidHepatic resectionLiver metastasesLiver MRILiver surgeryThermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID34663243
PMCPMC8524830
OpenAlexW3205006499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.