Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663238›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Prevalence of drug-drug interactions in older people before and after hospital admission: analysis from the OPERAM trial.

Lorène Zerah, Séverine Henrard, Ingeborg Wilting, Denis O'Mahony, Nicolas Rodondi, Olivia Dalleur, Kieran Dalton, Wilma Knol, Manuel Haschke, Anne Spinewine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Lorène ZerahClinical Pharmacy Research Group, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Avenue Mounier, 73 bte B1.73.06, 1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels, Belgium. Lorene.zerah@uclouvain.be.ORCID 0000-0002-3474-2200
Séverine HenrardClinical Pharmacy Research Group, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Avenue Mounier, 73 bte B1.73.06, 1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels, Belgium.
Ingeborg WiltingClinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Denis O'MahonySchool of Medicine, Geriatric Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Nicolas RodondiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Olivia DalleurClinical Pharmacy Research Group, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Avenue Mounier, 73 bte B1.73.06, 1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels, Belgium.
Kieran DaltonPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Wilma KnolDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Expertise Centre Pharmacotherapy in Old Persons, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Manuel HaschkeClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Anne SpinewineClinical Pharmacy Research Group, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Avenue Mounier, 73 bte B1.73.06, 1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels, Belgium.
UCLouvain · BEUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Bern · CHUtrecht University · NLCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug-drug interactions (DDIs) are highly prevalent in older patients but little is known about prevalence of DDIs over time. Our main objective was to assess changes in the prevalence and characteristics of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) during a one-year period after hospital admission in older people, and associated risk factors.

methodsWe conducted a sub-study of the European OPERAM trial (OPtimising thERapy to prevent Avoidable hospital admissions in Multimorbid older people), which assessed the effects of a structured medication review (experimental arm) compared to usual care (control arm) on reducing drug-related hospital readmissions. All OPERAM patients (≥70 years, with multimorbidity and polypharmacy, hospitalized in four centers in Bern, Brussels, Cork and Utrecht between December 2016 and October 2018, followed over 1 year) who were alive at hospital discharge and had full medication data during the index hospitalization (at baseline i.e., enrolment at admission, and at discharge) were included. DDIs were assessed using an international consensus list of potentially clinically significant DDIs in older people. The point-prevalence of DDIs was evaluated at baseline, discharge, and at 2, 6 and 12 months after hospitalization. Logistic regression models were performed to assess independent variables associated with changes in DDIs 2 months after baseline.

resultsOf the 1950 patients (median age 79 years) included, 1045 (54%) had at least one potentially clinically significant DDI at baseline; point-prevalence rates were 58, 57, 56 and 57% at discharge, and 2, 6 and 12 months, respectively. The prevalence increased significantly from baseline to discharge (P < .001 [significant only in the control group]), then remained stable over time (P for trend .31). The five most common DDIs -all pharmacodynamic in nature- accounted for 80% of all DDIs and involved drugs that affect potassium concentrations, centrally-acting drugs and antithrombotics. At 2 months, DDIs had increased in 459 (27%) patients and decreased in 331 (19%). The main factor predictive of a change in the prevalence of DDIs was hyperpolypharmacy (≥10 medications).

conclusionsDDIs were very common; their prevalence increased during hospitalization and tended to remain stable thereafter. Medication review may help control this increase and minimize the risk of adverse drug events.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsPolypharmacyAgedDrug InteractionsHospitalizationHospitalsHumansPrevalencePharmaceutical PreparationsDeprescribingDrug-drug interactionOlder personPolypharmacyPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID34663238
PMCPMC8524798
OpenAlexW3206204155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.