Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34663236›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.

Kristina Åhsberg, Anna Gardfjell, Emma Nimeus, Lisa Ryden, Sophia Zackrisson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04437602 (Added Value of Preoperative Contrast Enhanced Mammography), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04437602 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Added Value of Preoperative Contrast Enhanced Mammography (PROCEM) in Staging of Malignant Breast Lesions - a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion HallandRan2020 to 2029Enrolled441ConditionsBreast CancerArmsContrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Contrast-enhanced mammography improves patient access to functional breast imaging.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristina ÅhsbergDepartment of Surgery, Halland Hospital, 301 85, Halmstad, Sweden. kristina.ahsberg@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2652-2750
Anna GardfjellInstitution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Emma NimeusInstitution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lisa Ryden *Institution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sophia Zackrisson *Department of Imaging and Functional Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorrect preoperative estimation of the malignant extent is crucial for optimal planning of breast cancer surgery. The sensitivity of mammography is lower in dense breasts, and additional imaging techniques are sometimes warranted. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has shown similar sensitivity and in some cases better specificity, than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in small, observational studies. CEM may be more cost-effective than MRI, and may provide better identification of the tumor extent, however, no randomized trials have been performed to date to investigate the added value of CEM. In a feasibility study, we found that the treatment was changed in 10/47 (21%) cases after additional CEM. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the added value of CEM in preoperative staging of breast cancer in a randomized study.

methodThis prospective randomized study will include 440 patients with strongly suspected or established diagnosis of breast malignancy, based on assessment with mammography, ultrasound and core biopsy/cytology, and for whom primary surgery is planned. Patients will be randomized 1:1 using a web-based randomization tool to additional investigation with CEM or no further imaging. The CEM findings will be taken into consideration, which may lead to changes in primary treatment, which is the primary endpoint of this study. Secondary endpoints include rate of reoperation and number of avoidable mastectomies, as well as a cost-benefit analysis of additional CEM. Patient-reported health-related quality of life will be investigated at 1 year with the validated Breast-Q™ questionnaire. The rate of local recurrence or new cancer ipsi- or contralaterally within 5 years will be assessed from medical records and pathology reports. DISCUSSION: The aim of this trial is to explore the added value of CEM in preoperative staging of breast cancer. The results obtained from this study will contribute to our knowledge on CEM as an additional imaging method to standard investigation with digital mammography and ultrasound. The findings may also provide additional information on which patient groups would benefit from CEM, and on the economic aspects of CEM in standard preoperative practice.

trial registrationThis trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov , registration no: NCT04437602 , date of registration: June 18, 2020.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsContrast MediaMammographyNeoplasm StagingBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleBreastCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMastectomyMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPreoperative CareProspective StudiesQuality of LifeContrast MediaBreast cancerContrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)Extent estimationMastectomyPartial mastectomyPreoperative stagingRandomized trial

Identifiers

PMID34663236
PMCPMC8521511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.