Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34662869›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2021

A Global Crowdsourcing Open Call to Improve Research Mentorship in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Mixed Methods Analysis.

Emmanuela Oppong, Huanyu Bao, Weiming Tang, María I Echavarria Mejia, Franklin Glozah, Nsisong Asanga, Christine J Boinett, Ana M Aguilar, Ezra Valido, Trisasi Lestari and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emmanuela OppongUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Huanyu BaoUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Weiming TangUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
María I Echavarria MejiaCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas CIDEIM, Cali, Colombia.
Franklin GlozahDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Nsisong AsangaAkwa Ibom State Government, Uyo, Nigeria.
Christine J BoinettWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ana M AguilarInstitute of Health and Development Research, Universidad Mayor de San Adres, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
Ezra ValidoSwiss Paraplegic Research, SCI Population Biobanking and Translational Medicine, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Trisasi LestariUniversitas Gadjah Mada, Center for Tropical Medicine, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Joseph D TuckerUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

Mentoring Multidisciplinary Global HIV Patient-Oriented ResearchK24AI143471 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph David Tucker · 2019 to 2026
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI143471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research mentoring programs are limited in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The TDR Global initiated a global crowdsourcing open call soliciting proposals on how to improve research mentorship in LMICs. The purpose of this study is to examine ideas submitted to this open call to identify the ways to improve research mentorship in LMICs. Open calls have a group of individuals solve all or part of a problem and then share solutions. A WHO/TDR/SESH crowdsourcing guide was used to structure the open call. Each submission was judged by three independent individuals on a 1-10 scale. Textual submissions were extracted from eligible proposals and qualitatively analyzed via inductive and deductive coding techniques to identify themes. The open call received 123 submissions from 40 countries in Asia (49), Africa (38), Latin America (26), and Europe (10). Among all participants, 108 (87%) had research experience. A total of 21 submissions received a mean score of 7/10 or higher. Our thematic analysis identified three overarching themes related to prementoring, facilitation, and evaluation. Prementoring establishes mentor-mentee compatibility to lay foundations for mentorship. Facilitation involves iterative cycles of planning, communication, and skill improvement. Evaluation creates commitment and accountability within a framework of monitoring. This global crowdsourcing open call generated numerous mentorship ideas, including LMIC-contextualized facilitation tools. The open call demonstrates a need for greater focus on mentorship. Our data may inform the development of formal and informal mentoring programs in LMIC settings.

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingGlobal HealthMentorsSocial Determinants of HealthAdultAgedElectronic MailFemaleHumansIncomeInternetMaleMiddle AgedPovertyResearchSocial Networking

Identifiers

PMID34662869
PMCPMC8733547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.