Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34662803›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2021

The effect of ultrasound treatment in combination with nisin on the inactivation of Listeria innocua and Escherichia coli.

Katherine M Costello, Eirini Velliou, Jorge Gutierrez-Merino, Cindy Smet, Hani El Kadri, Jan F Van Impe, Madeleine Bussemaker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Predictive Modeling for Inactivation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine M CostelloDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK. Electronic address: katherine.costello@surrey.ac.uk.
Eirini VelliouDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK; Centre for 3D Models of Health and Disease, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London W1W 7TY, UK.
Jorge Gutierrez-MerinoSchool of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Cindy SmetBioTeC+ Chemical and Biochemical Process Technology and Control, KU Leuven Campus Gent, Gent, Belgium.
Hani El KadriDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Jan F Van ImpeBioTeC+ Chemical and Biochemical Process Technology and Control, KU Leuven Campus Gent, Gent, Belgium.
Madeleine BussemakerDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK. Electronic address: m.bussemaker@surrey.ac.uk.
University of Surrey · GBKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound, alone or in combination with natural antimicrobials, is a novel food processing technology of interest to replace traditional food decontamination methods, as it is milder than classical sterilisation (heat treatment) and maintains desirable sensory characteristics. However, ultrasound efficacy can be affected by food structure/composition, as well as the order in which combined treatments are applied. More specifically, treatments which target different cell components could result in enhanced inactivation if applied in the appropriate order. The microbial properties i.e. Gram positive/Gram negative can also impact the treatment efficacy. This work presents a systematic study of the combined effect of ultrasound and nisin on the inactivation of the bacteria Listeria innocua (Gram positive) and Escherichia coli (Gram negative), at a range of cavitation conditions (44, 500, 1000 kHz). The order of treatment application was varied, and the impact of system structure was also investigated by varying the concentration of Xanthan gum used to create the food model systems (0 - 0.5% w/v). Microbial inactivation kinetics were monitored, and advanced microscopy and flow cytometry techniques were utilised to quantify the impact of treatment on a cellular level. Ultrasound was shown to be effective against E. coli at 500 kHz only, with L. innocua demonstrating resistance to all frequencies studied. Enhanced inactivation of E. coli was observed for the combination of nisin and ultrasound at 500 kHz, but only when nisin was applied before ultrasound treatment. The system structure negatively impacted the inactivation efficacy. The combined effect of ultrasound and nisin on E. coli was attributed to short-lived destabilisation of the outer membrane as a result of sonication, allowing nisin to penetrate the cytoplasmic membrane and facilitate cell inactivation.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliListeriaAnti-Bacterial AgentsColony Count, MicrobialNisinAnti-Bacterial AgentsNisinE. coliHurdle technologyInactivationL. innocuaNisinUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID34662803
PMCPMC8560821
OpenAlexW3205248374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.