Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34662707›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm2022

A governing equation for rotor and wavelet number in human clinical ventricular fibrillation: Implications for sudden cardiac death.

Dhani Dharmaprani, Evan V Jenkins, Jing X Quah, Anandaroop Lahiri, Kathryn Tiver, Lewis Mitchell, Christopher P Bradley, Martin Hayward, David J Paterson, Peter Taggart and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Dhani DharmapraniCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia; College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Evan V JenkinsCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Jing X QuahCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.
Anandaroop LahiriDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.
Kathryn TiverDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.
Lewis MitchellSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Christopher P BradleyAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Martin HaywardUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; UCLH Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, London, United Kingdom.
David J PatersonDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Peter TaggartInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Richard H ClaytonInsigneo Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Martyn P NashAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Anand N GanesanCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia. Electronic address: anand.ganesan@flinders.edu.au.
Flinders Medical Centre · AUFlinders University · AUUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentricular fibrillation (VF) is characterized by multiple wavelets and rotors. No equation to predict the number of rotors and wavelets observed during fibrillation has been validated in human VF.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a single equation derived from a Markov M/M/∞ birth-death process could predict the number of rotors and wavelets occurring in human clinical VF.

methodsEpicardial induced VF (256-electrode) recordings obtained from patients undergoing cardiac surgery were studied (12 patients; 62 epochs). Rate constants for phase singularity (PS) (which occur at the pivot points of rotors) and wavefront (WF) formation and destruction were derived by fitting distributions to PS and WF interformation and lifetimes. These rate constants were combined in an M/M/∞ governing equation to predict the number of PS and WF in VF episodes. Observed distributions were compared to those predicted by the M/M/∞ equation.

resultsThe M/M/∞ equation accurately predicted average PS and WF number and population distribution, demonstrated in all epochs. Self-terminating episodes of VF were distinguished from VF episodes requiring termination by a trend toward slower PS destruction, slower rates of PS formation, and a slower mixing rate of the VF process, indicated by larger values of the second largest eigenvalue modulus of the M/M/∞ birth-death matrix. The longest-lasting PS (associated with rotors) had shorter interactivation time intervals compared to shorter-lasting PS lasting <150 ms (∼1 PS rotation in human VF).

conclusionThe M/M/∞ equation explains the number of wavelets and rotors observed, supporting a paradigm of VF based on statistical fibrillatory dynamics.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresDeath, Sudden, CardiacEpicardial MappingFemaleHeart Conduction SystemHumansMaleMarkov ChainsModels, CardiovascularVentricular FibrillationMechanismPhase singularityRenewal processRotorVentricular fibrillationWavelet

Identifiers

PMID34662707
OpenAlexW3207485885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.