ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2021
Evolution of seed mass associated with mating systems in multiple plant families.
Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evolutionary dynamics of plant mating systems: how bias for studying 'interesting' plant reproductive systems could backfire.Annals of botany · 2025Review
- Population size as a major determinant of mating system and population genetic differentiation in a narrow endemic chasmophyte.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- The selfing syndrome and beyond: diverse evolutionary consequences of mating system transitions in plants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Review
- Geographic variation in offspring size: Long- and short-term climate affect mean seed mass of Streptanthus populations.Ecology · 2022Article
- Evolution of seed mass associated with mating systems in multiple plant families.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In flowering plants, the evolution of self-fertilization (selfing) from obligate outcrossing is regarded as one of the most prevalent evolutionary transitions. The evolution of selfing is often accompanied by various changes in genomic, physiological and morphological properties. In particular, a set of reproductive traits observed typically in selfing species is called the "selfing syndrome". A mathematical model based on the kinship theory of genetic imprinting predicted that seed mass should become smaller in selfing species compared with outcrossing congeners, as a consequence of the reduced conflict between maternally and paternally derived alleles in selfing plants. Here, we test this prediction by examining the association between mating system and seed mass across a wide range of taxa (642 species), considering potential confounding factors: phylogenetic relationships and growth form. We focused on three plant families-Solanaceae, Brassicaceae and Asteraceae-where information on mating systems is abundant, and the analysis was performed for each family separately. When phylogenetic relationships were controlled, we consistently observed that selfers (represented by self-compatible species) tended to have a smaller seed mass compared with outcrossers (represented by self-incompatible species) in these families. In summary, our analysis suggests that small seeds should also be considered a hallmark of the selfing syndrome, although we note that mating systems have relatively small effects on seed mass variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.