Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34662403›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

ORTHOSCOPE*: A Phylogenetic Pipeline to Infer Gene Histories from Genome-Wide Data.

Jun Inoue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jun InoueCenter for Earth Surface System Dynamics, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4954-6373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative genome-scale analyses of protein-coding gene sequences are employed to examine evidence for whole-genome duplication and horizontal gene transfer. For this purpose, an orthogroup should be delineated to infer evolutionary history regarding each gene, and results of all orthogroup analyses need to be integrated to infer a genome-scale history. An orthogroup is a set of genes descended from a single gene in the last common ancestor of all species under consideration. However, such analyses confront several problems: 1) Analytical pipelines to infer all gene histories with methods comparing species and gene trees are not fully developed, and 2) without detailed analyses within orthogroups, evolutionary events of paralogous genes in the same orthogroup cannot be distinguished for genome-wide integration of results derived from multiple orthogroup analyses. Here I present an analytical pipeline, ORTHOSCOPE* (star), to infer evolutionary histories of animal/plant genes from genome-scale data. ORTHOSCOPE* estimates a tree for a specified gene, detects speciation/gene duplication events that occurred at nodes belonging to only one lineage leading to a species of interest, and then integrates results derived from gene trees estimated for all query genes in genome-wide data. Thus, ORTHOSCOPE* can be used to detect species nodes just after whole-genome duplications as a first step of comparative genomic analyses. Moreover, by examining the presence or absence of genes belonging to species lineages with dense taxon sampling available from the ORTHOSCOPE web version, ORTHOSCOPE* can detect genes lost in specific lineages and horizontal gene transfers. This pipeline is available at https://github.com/jun-inoue/ORTHOSCOPE_STAR.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenomeAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGene Transfer, HorizontalPhylogenyanimals and plantsgenome comparisonsorthogrouporthologyORTHOSCOPE*species tree and gene tree

Identifiers

PMID34662403
PMCPMC8763121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.