Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34662358›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Puerto Ricans and Mexican immigrants differ in their psychological responses to patterns of lifetime adversity.

Daniel K Cooper, Mayra Bámaca-Colbert, Eric K Layland, Emily G Simpson, Benjamin L Bayly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel K CooperDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7144-8406
Mayra Bámaca-ColbertDepartment of Psychological Sciences (Developmental Area), University of California, Merced, California, United States of America.
Eric K LaylandCenter for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0641-408X
Emily G SimpsonDepartment of Psychology, East Central University, Ada, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Benjamin L BaylyAgricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
East Central University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of California, Merced · USUniversity of South Carolina · USYale University · US

Funding

Pilot, Mentoring, and Professional Development CoreP50DA039838 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LI, RUNZE · 2015 to 2019
$13.9M
INTERDISCIPLINARY HIV PREVENTION TRAINING PROGRAMT32MH020031 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Trace S Kershaw · 1999 to 2026
$12.1M
PREVENTION AND METHODOLOGY TRAINING (PAMT)T32DA017629 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI Eric D Claus, Rina D Eiden · 2005 to 2026
$9.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039838NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA017629NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPuerto Ricans and Mexican immigrants are often exposed to multiple types of adversity across their lifetime (e.g., maltreatment, household dysfunction, discrimination) and this exposure can increase the risk for adult mental health problems. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to (a) identify subgroups of individuals exposed to unique combinations of childhood adversity and lifetime discrimination among Puerto Ricans and Mexican immigrants, and (b) compare the prevalence of mental health problems across different risk profiles.

methodWe used existing data from the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study. Participants included Puerto Rican (N = 402) and Mexican adults (N = 1351) born outside but living in the continental U.S.

findingsThrough latent profile analysis, we selected a three-profile solution for Puerto Ricans: (a) Low Exposure (low on all adversity items; 58% of sample), (b) Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) Only (high on ACEs items, average or lower than average on discrimination items; 32%), and (c) Dual Exposure (high on all adversity items; 10%). For Mexicans, we selected a four-profile solution: (a) Low Exposure (52%), (b) ACEs Only (24%), (c) Maltreatment and Discrimination (15%), and (d) Dual Exposure (9%). For Mexicans, we found that the Dual Exposure and the Maltreatment and Discrimination profiles had the highest levels of mental health problems. For Puerto Ricans, the Dual Exposure and ACEs Only profiles had the highest levels of mental health problems, suggesting that Puerto Ricans may be more vulnerable to the effects of childhood adversities as compared to Mexican immigrants. Results from our study indicate that different patterns of adversity exposure are linked to different levels of mental health outcomes, and therefore, may require different intervention dosage. Understanding which groups of individuals are at highest and lowest risk for mental health problems is critical for developing effective, tailored interventions to prevent the negative effects of childhood adversity and discrimination for Latinxs.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesAngerAnxietyDepressionEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMexicoMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalProbabilityPuerto Rico

Identifiers

PMID34662358
PMCPMC8523059
OpenAlexW3165565479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.