Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34662356›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Spatiotemporal inflection points in human running: Effects of training level and athletic modality.

Yuta Goto, Tetsuya Ogawa, Gaku Kakehata, Naoya Sazuka, Atsushi Okubo, Yoshihiro Wakita, Shigeo Iso, Kazuyuki Kanosue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuta GotoGraduate School of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.
Tetsuya OgawaDepartment of Clothing, Faculty of Human Sciences and Design, Women's University Tokyo, Japan.
Gaku KakehataGraduate School of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.
Naoya SazukaTokyo Laboratory 25, R&D Center, Sony Group Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi OkuboTokyo Laboratory 07, R&D Center, Sony Group Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro WakitaTokyo Laboratory 07, R&D Center, Sony Group Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeo IsoFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.
Kazuyuki KanosueFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of the different training regimes and histories on the spatiotemporal characteristics of human running was evaluated in four groups of subjects who had different histories of engagement in running-specific training; sprinters, distance runners, active athletes, and sedentary individuals. Subjects ran at a variety of velocities, ranging from slowest to fastest, over 30 trials in a random order. Group averages of maximal running velocities, ranked from fastest to slowest, were: sprinters, distance runners, active athletes, and sedentary individuals. The velocity-cadence-step length (V-C-S) relationship, made by plotting step length against cadence at each velocity tested, was analyzed with the segmented regression method, utilizing two regression lines. In all subject groups, there was a critical velocity, defined as the inflection point, in the relationship. In the velocity ranges below and above the inflection point (slower and faster velocity ranges), velocity was modulated primarily by altering step length and by altering cadence, respectively. This pattern was commonly observed in all four groups, not only in sprinters and distance runners, as has already been reported, but also in active athletes and sedentary individuals. This pattern may reflect an energy saving strategy. When the data from all groups were combined, there were significant correlations between maximal running velocity and both running velocity and step length at the inflection point. In spite of the wide variety of athletic experience of the subjects, as well as their maximum running velocities, the inflection point appeared at a similar cadence (3.0 ± 0.2 steps/s) and at a similar relative velocity (65-70%Vmax). These results imply that the influence of running-specific training on the inflection point is minimal.

Indexed as

AthletesAdultAthletic PerformanceBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleRunningSpatio-Temporal AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34662356
PMCPMC8523042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.