Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34662341›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Does information structuring improve recall of discharge information? A cluster randomized clinical trial.

Victoria Siegrist, Rui Mata, Wolf Langewitz, Heike Gerger, Stephan Furger, Ralph Hertwig, Roland Bingisser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Victoria SiegristEmergency Department, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8661-1632
Rui MataCenter for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Wolf LangewitzDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine-Communication in Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Heike GergerClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Stephan FurgerTranslational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7467-2510
Ralph HertwigCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Roland BingisserEmergency Department, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHMax Planck Institute for Human Development · DEUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe impact of the quality of discharge communication between physicians and their patients is critical on patients' health outcomes. Nevertheless, low recall of information given to patients at discharge from emergency departments (EDs) is a well-documented problem. Therefore, we investigated the outcomes and related benefits of two different communication strategies: Physicians were instructed to either use empathy (E) or information structuring (S) skills hypothesizing superior recall by patients in the S group.

methodsFor the direct comparison of two communication strategies at discharge, physicians were cluster-randomized to an E or a S skills training. Feasibility was measured by training completion rates. Outcomes were measured in patients immediately after discharge, after 7, and 30 days. Primary outcome was patients' immediate recall of discharge information. Secondary outcomes were feasibility of training implementation, patients' adherence to recommendations and satisfaction, as well as the patient-physician relationship.

resultsOf 117 eligible physicians, 80 (68.4%) completed the training. Out of 256 patients randomized to one of the two training groups (E: 146 and S: 119) 196 completed the post-discharge assessment. Patients' immediate recall of discharge information was superior in patients in the S-group vs. E-group. Patients in the S-group adhered to more recommendations within 30 days (p = .002), and were more likely to recommend the physician to family and friends (p = .021). No differences were found on other assessed outcome domains. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Immediate recall and subsequent adherence to recommendations were higher in the S group. Feasibility was shown by a 69.6% completion rate of trainings. Thus, trainings of discharge information structuring are feasible and improve patients' recall, and may therefore improve quality of care in the ED.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsAbdominal PainAdultAftercareEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient SatisfactionRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID34662341
PMCPMC8523048
OpenAlexW3207578701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.