Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34661721›Full record

ReviewInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2022

Migrant workers occupational health research: an OMEGA-NET working group position paper.

Emine Aktas, Barbara Bergbom, Lode Godderis, Bertina Kreshpaj, Mario Marinov, Dana Mates, Damien M McElvenny, Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum, Valentina Milenkova, Evangelia Nena and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Longitudinal Renal Function Degradation Among Florida Agricultural Workers.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. What is next for occupational cancer epidemiology?Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2022
    Article
  20. Occupational Health Research: Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Countries.Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 10 countries.

Emine AktasFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Department of Public Health Nursing, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2635-7588
Barbara BergbomFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5245-6419
Lode GodderisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment & Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4764-8835
Bertina KreshpajUnit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2991-6026
Mario MarinovSouth-West University "Neofit Rilski", Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria.
Dana MatesThe National Institute of Public Health, Bucharest, Romania.
Damien M McElvennyInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0953-8336
Ingrid Sivesind MehlumNational Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0830-284X
Valentina MilenkovaSouth-West University "Neofit Rilski", Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria.
Evangelia NenaMedical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0381-4715
Deborah C GlassMonCOEH, Monash University, 553 ST Kilda Road, Melbourne, 3004, Australia. Deborah.glass@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7559-008X
South-West University "Neofit Rilski" · BGDemocritus University of Thrace · GREuropean External Action Service · BEFinnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRKarolinska Institutet · SEMonash University · AUNational Institute of Occupational Health · NONational School of Public Health, Management and Professional Development · ROUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aims of the study were: (1) to clarify the definitions of "migrant" used in occupational health research; (2) to summarize migrant workers' industry sectors, occupations and employment conditions; (3) to identify the occupational health and safety services available to migrant workers; (4) to summarize work-related health problems found among migrant workers; (5) to identify the methodological challenges to research into occupational health of migrant workers; and (6) to recommend improvements in migrant occupational health research.

methodsThis position paper was prepared by researchers from several European countries and Australia, working within the EU COST Action OMEGA-NET. The paper drew on two recent systematic reviews on the occupational health of international migrant workers and other literature, and also identified uncertainties and gaps in the research literature. Migrants may, for example, be temporary or permanent, moving for specific jobs migrants or other reasons. Their ethnicity and language capabilities will affect their work opportunities.

resultsThe occupational health literature seldom adequately identifies the heterogeneity or characteristics of the migrant group being studied. Migrants tend to work in more physically and mentally demanding environments with higher exposures than native workers. Migrants tend to have an increased risk of physical and mental ill health, but less access to health care services. This has been demonstrated recently by high rates of COVID-19 and less access to health care. There have been a number of cross-sectional studies of migrant health but few long-term cohort studies were identified. Other study designs, such as registry-based studies, surveys and qualitative studies may complement cross-sectional studies. Mixed-methodology studies would be valuable in research on migrants' occupational health. Language and lack of trust are barriers to migrant research participation.

conclusionTargeted research, especially longitudinal, identifying how these economically important but often-vulnerable workers can be best assisted is needed. Researchers should identify the characteristics of the migrant workers that they are studying including visa/migration circumstances (temporary, permanent, undocumented), racial and ethnic characteristics, existing skills and language abilities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Occupational HealthTransients and MigrantsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansOccupationsMigrant workersNative workersOccupational healthStudy designWorking conditionsWork-related health

Identifiers

PMID34661721
PMCPMC8521506
OpenAlexW3205163797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.