ArticleRheumatology international2021
Clinical and technical determinants of positive temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal artery biopsy and temporal artery ultrasound inter-rater agreement for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: an ancillary analysis from the multicentre prospective ECHORTON study.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- The impact of histopathological criteria for definite vasculitis in giant cell arteritis: retrospective analysis of temporal artery biopsies.Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis by temporal artery biopsy is associated with biopsy length.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is one of the diagnostic tools to confirm the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). We aim to evaluate the clinical and technical determinants of a positive biopsy. Demographics, clinical, technical, and laboratory data of all TAB's performed between 2007 and 2019 at a single academic medical center. 107 biopsies performed for 103 patients were included; 72.9% were female, and 27.1% were male. The mean age at the time of biopsy was 67.1 ± 9.3 years. One biopsy was excluded for lack of arterial tissue content. Of the remaining 106, 19.6% were positive. The length of the biopsy and the number of arterial cross-sections were not significantly associated with its result. A positive biopsy was seen more in patients with low albumin (p = 0.010) and hypothyroidism (p = 0.017) but less in those with prior glucocorticoids treatment (p = 0.028). Predictors of a positive biopsy included male gender [OR 4.029, 95% CI (1.330-12.209), p = 0.014]; elevated ESR [OR 3.998, 95% CI (1.908-6.787), p = 0.023]; polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) symptoms [OR 5.121, 95% CI (2.094-9.872), p = 0.001]; and advancing in age (6.5% per every additional year), [OR 1.065, 95% CI (1.005-1.130), p = 0.033]. 53.7% of the patients were eventually diagnosed with GCA; 39.2% of them were based on positive biopsy. In conclusion, old age, male gender, elevated ESR, and PMR symptoms increase the odds of positive TAB. Technical factors, such as biopsy length and the number of cross-sections, did not influence eventual biopsy results, highlighting the pivotal role of the clinical presentation of the patients in selecting patients for TAB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.