Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34661698›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2022

Automated subcortical volume estimation from 2D MRI in epilepsy and implications for clinical trials.

Daniel Brownhill, Yachin Chen, Barbara A K Kreilkamp, Christophe de Bezenac, Christine Denby, Martyn Bracewell, Shubhabrata Biswas, Kumar Das, Anthony G Marson, Simon S Keller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniel BrownhillDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. hldbrown@liv.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3103-5770
Yachin ChenDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Barbara A K KreilkampDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-5191
Christophe de BezenacDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Christine DenbyThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Martyn BracewellThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Shubhabrata BiswasThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Kumar DasThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Anthony G MarsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Simon S KellerDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-9795
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Epilepsy Research UK 1085Medical Research Council MR/K023152/1Medical Research Council MR/S00355X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost techniques used for automatic segmentation of subcortical brain regions are developed for three-dimensional (3D) MR images. MRIs obtained in non-specialist hospitals may be non-isotropic and two-dimensional (2D). Automatic segmentation of 2D images may be challenging and represents a lost opportunity to perform quantitative image analysis. We determine the performance of a modified subcortical segmentation technique applied to 2D images in patients with idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE).

methodsVolume estimates were derived from 2D (0.4 × 0.4 × 3 mm) and 3D (1 × 1x1mm) T1-weighted acquisitions in 31 patients with IGE and 39 healthy controls. 2D image segmentation was performed using a modified FSL FIRST (FMRIB Integrated Registration and Segmentation Tool) pipeline requiring additional image reorientation, cropping, interpolation and brain extraction prior to conventional FIRST segmentation. Consistency between segmentations was assessed using Dice coefficients and volumes across both approaches were compared between patients and controls. The influence of slice thickness on consistency was further assessed using 2D images with slice thickness increased to 6 mm.

resultsAll average Dice coefficients showed excellent agreement between 2 and 3D images across subcortical structures (0.86-0.96). Most 2D volumes were consistently slightly lower compared to 3D volumes. 2D images with increased slice thickness showed lower agreement with 3D images with lower Dice coefficients (0.55-0.83). Significant volume reduction of the left and right thalamus and putamen was observed in patients relative to controls across 2D and 3D images.

conclusionAutomated subcortical volume estimation of 2D images with a resolution of 0.4 × 0.4x3mm using a modified FIRST pipeline is consistent with volumes derived from 3D images, although this consistency decreases with an increased slice thickness. Thalamic and putamen atrophy has previously been reported in patients with IGE. Automated subcortical volume estimation from 2D images is feasible and most reliable at using in-plane acquisitions greater than 1 mm x 1 mm and provides an opportunity to perform quantitative image analysis studies in clinical trials.

Indexed as

EpilepsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin EAutomatic segmentationEpilepsySubcorticalTwo-dimensional segmentation

Identifiers

PMID34661698
PMCPMC9005416
OpenAlexW3206290082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.