ReviewDer Radiologe2021
[Structured reporting in radiology : German and European radiology societies' point of view].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- [Misdiagnoses in the diagnostics of the abdomen and pelvis].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Structured reporting enhances diagnostic quality in periapical dental radiographs: a comparative evaluation.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- ESR Essentials: ten steps to cardiac MR-practice recommendations by ESCR.European radiology · 2024Review
- [Imaging for urolithiasis].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- [Report template from the German Society of Urology and the German Radiological Society for standardized, structured reporting of native computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of urinary stones].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Article
- Structured Reporting in Radiological Settings: Pitfalls and Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous publications have shown the value of structured reporting in communication with referring physicians and for further usage of clinical report data in other contexts. Despite the topic being present and known in radiology for many years now, widespread adoption of structured reporting in clinical routine is still lacking. All major radiological societies have published position statements in favor of structured reporting and are pursuing various related initiatives. Among those are the development and the maintenance of openly available structured report template repositories as well as quality control of report templates and development of standardized terminologies. This article highlights the efforts of the German Radiological Society and the European Society of Radiology on the topic of structured reporting and provides an overview of pros and cons as well as publicly available resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.