Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34661660›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Comparison of Sleep and Attention Metrics Among Nurses Working Shifts on a Forward- vs Backward-Rotating Schedule.

Marco Di Muzio, Giulia Diella, Emanuele Di Simone, Mariella Pazzaglia, Valentina Alfonsi, Luana Novelli, Angelo Cianciulli, Serena Scarpelli, Maurizio Gorgoni, Annamaria Giannini and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Work schedule characteristics and sleepiness - a meta-analysis.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Occupation-Induced Fatigue and Impacts on Emergency First Responders: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Salivary Biomarkers Analysis and Neurobehavioral Assessment in Nurses Working Rotation Shifts: A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marco Di MuzioDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Giulia DiellaDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Emanuele Di SimoneDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Mariella PazzagliaDepartment of Psychology, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Valentina AlfonsiBody and Action Lab, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Luana NovelliDepartment of Psychology, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Angelo CianciulliDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Serena ScarpelliBody and Action Lab, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio GorgoniDepartment of Psychology, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Annamaria GianniniDepartment of Psychology, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Michele FerraraDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Fabio LucidiDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Luigi De GennaroDepartment of Psychology, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The association of fast backward-rotating shift work (ie, anticlockwise sequence of afternoon, morning, and night shifts) with subjective and objective measures of sleep-wake quality, daytime attention, and tiredness of health care workers has not yet been established. Objective: To investigate the association of shift rotation direction with tiredness, sleepiness, and sustained attention among nurses working forward- and backward-rotating shifts. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data of this cohort study were collected from nurses working at 5 midsized Italian hospitals. The nurses had either a forward-rotating schedule (ie, morning to afternoon to night) and or a backward-rotating schedule (ie, afternoon to morning to night). The data were collected from July 2017 to February 2020. Data analysis was performed from May to October 2020. Exposures: Participants were working either forward- or backward-rotating schedules, in which the sequence of 3 shifts (morning, afternoon, and night) changed in a clockwise or anticlockwise direction. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sleep data were collected using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Sustained attention was measured using the Psychomotor Vigilance Task. Tiredness was evaluated using the Tiredness Symptom Scale. Results: A total of 144 nurses (mean [SE] age, 41.3 [0.8] years; 92 women [63.9%]) participated in the study; 80 nurses had forward-rotating schedules, and 64 had backward-rotating schedules. Nurses with irregular sleep-wake patterns due to night shift work had poor sleep quality (46 [57.5%] in forward-rotating schedule group; 37 [57.8%] in backward-rotating schedule group). Nurses working backward-rotating shifts exhibited significantly greater sleepiness (F1,139 = 41.23; P < .001) and cognitive slowing (ie, longer median reaction times; F1,139 = 42.12; P < .001) than those working forward rotations. Importantly, these differences were not affected by age, years of employment, and quality of sleep. Of nurses working on a backward-rotating schedule, 60 (93.8%) reported elevated sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale score ≥7) after the night shift. The median reaction time (F1,139 = 42.12; P < .001), 10% fastest reaction time (F1,139 = 97.07; P < .001), minor lapses (F1,139 = 46.29; P < .001), and reaction time distribution (F1,139 = 60.13; P < .001) of nurses on backward-rotating schedules indicated a lower level of vigilance, which is negatively associated with neurobehavioral performance. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, both shift rotation models were negatively associated with health and cognitive performance. These findings suggest that forward shift rotation may be more beneficial than backward rotation for several measured performance attentional outcomes and sleepiness. Optimization of shift rotations should be implemented to decrease the combination of the negative outcomes associated with shift work and reduce the potential risk of medical errors in health care systems.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionFemaleHumansItalyMaleNursesPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingSleepSleep QualityWork Schedule Tolerance

Identifiers

PMID34661660
PMCPMC8524311
OpenAlexW3206210239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.