Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34661620›Full record

ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Key Findings of the French BioNutriNet Project on Organic Food-Based Diets: Description, Determinants, and Relationships to Health and the Environment.

Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Denis Lairon, Benjamin Allès, Louise Seconda, Pauline Rebouillat, Joséphine Brunin, Rodolphe Vidal, Bruno Taupier-Letage, Pilar Galan, Marie-Josèphe Amiot and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Organic Food Consumption and Perception among Polish Mothers of Children under 6 Years Old.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmanuelle Kesse-GuyotORCID 0000-0002-9715-3534
Denis Lairon
Pauline RebouillatORCID 0000-0002-7270-6032
Joséphine Brunin
Bruno Taupier-Letage
Marie-Josèphe Amiot
Sandrine Péneau
Christine Boizot-Santai
Véronique Ducros
Louis-Georges Soler
Jean-Pierre Cravedi
Laurent Debrauwer
Brigitte Langevin
Philippe Pointereau
Julia Baudry
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRMelt Organic (United States) · USSolagro · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRInserm · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have investigated the relationships between organic food consumption, dietary patterns, monetary diet cost, health, and the environment. To address these issues, a consortium of French epidemiologists, nutritionists, economists, and toxicologists launched the BioNutriNet project in 2013. In 2014, an FFQ documented the usual organic and nonorganic (conventional) food consumption of approximately 35,000 NutriNet-Santé participants. Then, individual organic and conventional food intakes were merged with price, environmental, and pesticide residue data sets, which distinguished between conventional and organic farming methods. Many studies were conducted to characterize organic consumers and their environmental impacts (i.e., greenhouse gas emissions, energy demand, and land use) and organic food consumption impacts on health. We observed that organic consumers had diets that were healthier and richer in plant-based food than nonorganic consumers. Their diets were associated with higher monetary costs, lower environmental impacts, and reduced exposure to certain pesticide residues. Regular consumption of organic food was associated with reduced risks of obesity, type 2 diabetes, postmenopausal breast cancer, and lymphoma. Although several observations have been confirmed by several studies conducted in other countries, our results should be replicated in other cultural settings and coupled with experimental studies to be able to draw causal conclusions. Finally, the main finding of the BioNutriNet project is that while organic food consumption could be associated with positive externalities on human health and the environment, organic-based diets should be accompanied by dietary shifts toward plant-based diets to allow for better planetary and human health.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Food, OrganicDietEnvironmentHealth StatusHumanschronic diseasescumulative energy demanddietary greenhouse gas emissionsdietary pesticide exposuredietary scoresmonetary diet costobservational dataorganic food consumptionsustainability indicators

Identifiers

PMID34661620
PMCPMC8803492
OpenAlexW3206027531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.