ArticleJASA express letters2021
Band importance for speech-in-speech recognition.
Article in JASA express letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating band importance for environmental sound recognition using deep learninga).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Cross-frequency interactions in band importance functions.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- English band importance functions in competing speech for Spanish-speaking second-language learners of English.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Band importance for speech-in-speech recognition in the presence of extended high-frequency cues.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Effects of entropy in real-world noise on speech perception in listeners with normal hearing and hearing lossa).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Spectral weighting for sentence recognition in steady-state and amplitude-modulated noise.JASA express letters · 2023Article
- On the use of the TIMIT, QuickSIN, NU-6, and other widely used bandlimited speech materials for speech perception experiments.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Maturation of Speech-in-Speech Recognition for Whispered and Voiced Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting masked speech perception typically relies on estimates of the spectral distribution of cues supporting recognition. Current methods for estimating band importance for speech-in-noise use filtered stimuli. These methods are not appropriate for speech-in-speech because filtering can modify stimulus features affecting auditory stream segregation. Here, band importance is estimated by quantifying the relationship between speech recognition accuracy for full-spectrum speech and the target-to-masker ratio by channel at the output of an auditory filterbank. Preliminary results provide support for this approach and indicate that frequencies below 2 kHz may contribute more to speech recognition in two-talker speech than in speech-shaped noise.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.