Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34661103›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2021

Characterizing batch effects and binding site-specific variability in ChIP-seq data.

Mingxiang Teng, Dongliang Du, Danfeng Chen, Rafael A Irizarry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Statistical Analysis in ChIP-seq-Related Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mingxiang TengDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8536-8941
Dongliang DuDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Danfeng ChenLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Rafael A IrizarryDepartment of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Supplement: Enhancing Community Contributions to Bioconductor With Build System Containerization and a GPU for TestingU24HG004059 · NHGRI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI VINCENT JAMES CAREY, Rafael Angel Irizarry · 2021 to 2026
$7.3M
Data Analysis Tools for Emerging High-Throughput TechnologiesR35GM131802 · NIGMS · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Rafael Angel Irizarry · 2019 to 2026
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG004059NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sources of variability can bias ChIP-seq data toward inferring transcription factor (TF) binding profiles. As ChIP-seq datasets increase in public repositories, it is now possible and necessary to account for complex sources of variability in ChIP-seq data analysis. We find that two types of variability, the batch effects by sequencing laboratories and differences between biological replicates, not associated with changes in condition or state, vary across genomic sites. This implies that observed differences between samples from different conditions or states, such as cell-type, must be assessed statistically, with an understanding of the distribution of obscuring noise. We present a statistical approach that characterizes both differences of interests and these source of variability through the parameters of a mixed effects model. We demonstrate the utility of our approach on a CTCF binding dataset composed of 211 samples representing 90 different cell-types measured across three different laboratories. The results revealed that sites exhibiting large variability were associated with sequence characteristics such as GC-content and low complexity. Finally, we identified TFs associated with high-variance CTCF sites using TF motifs documented in public databases, pointing the possibility of these being false positives if the sources of variability are not properly accounted for.

Identifiers

PMID34661103
PMCPMC8515842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.