Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34660938›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

An Automatic Framework to Create Patient-specific Eye Models From 3D Magnetic Resonance Images for Treatment Selection in Patients With Uveal Melanoma.

Mohamed Kilany Hassan, Emmanuelle Fleury, Denis Shamonin, Lorna Grech Fonk, Marina Marinkovic, Myriam G Jaarsma-Coes, Gregorius P M Luyten, Andrew Webb, Jan-Willem Beenakker, Berend Stoel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Weakly Supervised Bayesian Shape Modeling from Unsegmented Medical Images.Shape in medical imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 6, 2024, Proceedings. ShapeMI (Workshop) (2024 : Marrakech, Morocco) · 2025
    Article
  3. Automated segmentation for early detection of uveal melanoma.Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2024
    Article
  4. Quantitative Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Uveal Melanoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. MRI-based 3D retinal shape determination.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed Kilany HassanDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Emmanuelle FleuryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Denis ShamoninDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lorna Grech FonkDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marina MarinkovicDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Myriam G Jaarsma-CoesDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gregorius P M LuytenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Andrew WebbDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jan-Willem BeenakkerDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Berend StoelDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal treatment strategy for uveal melanoma (UM) relies on many factors, the most important being tumor size and location. Building on recent developments in high-resolution 3D ocular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we developed an automatic image-processing framework to create patient-specific eye models and to subsequently determine the full 3D tumor shape and size automatically. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 15 patients with UM, 3D inversion-recovery gradient-echo (T1-weighted) and 3D fat-suppressed spin-echo (T2-weighted) images were acquired with a 7T MRI scanner. First, the sclera and cornea were segmented from the T2-weighted image by mesh-fitting. The T1- and T2-weighted images were then coregistered. From the registered T1-weighted image, the lens, vitreous body, retinal detachment, and tumor were segmented. Fuzzy C-means clustering was used to differentiate the tumor from retinal detachments. The tumor model was verified and (if needed) edited by an ophthalmic MRI specialist. Subsequently, the prominence and largest basal diameter of the tumor were measured automatically based on the verified contours. These results were compared with manual assessments on the original images and with ultrasound measurements to show the errors in manual analysis.

resultsThe framework successfully created an eye model fully automatically in 12 cases. In these cases, a Dice similarity coefficient (mean surface distance) of 97.7%±0.84% (0.17±0.11 mm) was achieved for the sclera, 96.8%±1.05% (0.20±0.06 mm) for the vitreous body, 91.6%±4.83% (0.15±0.06 mm) for the lens, and 86.0%±7.4% (0.35±0.27 mm) for the tumor. The manual assessments deviated, on average, 0.39±0.31 mm in prominence and 1.7±1.22 mm in basal diameter from the automatic measurements.

conclusionsThe described framework combined information from T1- and T2-weighted images to accurately determine tumor boundaries in 3D. The proposed process may have a direct effect on clinical workflow, as it enables an accurate 3D assessment of tumor dimensions, which directly influences therapy selection.

Identifiers

PMID34660938
PMCPMC8503565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.