Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34660914›Full record

Observational studyBMJ paediatrics open2021

Impact of stimulation among non-crying neonates with intact cord versus clamped cord on birth outcomes: observation study.

Ashish Kc, Shyam Sundar Budhathoki, Jeevan Thapa, Susan Niermeyer, Rejina Gurung, Nalini Singhal, Nepal Neonatal Network

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ paediatrics open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Ashish KcDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0541-4486
Shyam Sundar BudhathokiDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8614-1087
Jeevan ThapaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-5101-9460
Susan NiermeyerPediatrics, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Rejina GurungDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4262-3543
Nalini SinghalPediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nepal Neonatal Network
Uppsala University · SENepal Development Research Institute · NPPatan Academy of Health Sciences · NPUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stimulation of non-crying neonates after birth can help transition to spontaneous breathing. In this study, we aim to assess the impact of intact versus clamped umbilical cord on spontaneous breathing after stimulation of non-crying neonates. Methods: This is an observational study among non-crying neonates (n=3073) born in hospitals of Nepal. Non-crying neonates born vaginally at gestational age ≥34 weeks were observed for their response to stimulation with the cord intact or clamped. Obstetric characteristics of the neonates were analysed. Association of spontaneous breathing with cord management was assessed using logistic regression. Results: Among non-crying neonates, 2563 received stimulation. Of these, a higher proportion of the neonates were breathing in the group with cord intact as compared with the group cord clamped (81.1% vs 68.9%, p<0.0001). The use of bag-and-mask ventilation was lower among those who were stimulated with the cord intact than those who were stimulated with cord clamped (18.0% vs 32.4%, p<0.0001). The proportion of neonates with Apgar Score ≤3 at 1 min was lower with the cord intact than with cord clamped (7.6% vs 11.5%, p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, neonates with intact cord had 84% increased odds of spontaneous breathing (adjusted OR, 1.84; 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.29) compared with those with cord clamped. Conclusions: Stimulation of non-crying neonates with intact cord was associated with more spontaneous breathing than among infants who were stimulated with cord clamped. Intact cord stimulation may help establish spontaneous breathing in apnoeic neonates, but residual confounding variables may be contributing to the findings. This study provides evidence for further controlled research to evaluate the effect of initial steps of resuscitation with cord intact.

Indexed as

ParturitionUmbilical CordApgar ScoreFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyResuscitationepidemiologyneonatologyresuscitation

Identifiers

PMID34660914
PMCPMC8488701
OpenAlexW3203122773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.