Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34660686›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2021

Individualized Determination of the Mechanical Fracture Environment After Tibial Exchange Nailing-A Simulation-Based Feasibility Study.

Benedikt J Braun, Marcel Orth, Stefan Diebels, Kerstin Wickert, Annchristin Andres, Joshua Gawlitza, Arno Bücker, Tim Pohlemann, Michael Roland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Smart crutch tipsEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benedikt J BraunUniversity Hospital Tuebingen on Behalf of the Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Faculty of Medicine, BG Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Marcel OrthDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany.
Stefan DiebelsDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany.
Kerstin WickertDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany.
Annchristin AndresDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany.
Joshua GawlitzaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Arno BückerClinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany.
Tim PohlemannDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany.
Michael RolandDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-union rate after tibial fractures remains high. Apart from largely uncontrollable biologic, injury, and patient-specific factors, the mechanical fracture environment is a key determinant of healing. Our aim was to establish a patient-specific simulation workflow to determine the mechanical fracture environment and allow for an estimation of its healing potential. In a referred patient with failed nail-osteosynthesis after tibial-shaft fracture exchange nailing was performed. Post-operative CT-scans were used to construct a three-dimensional model of the treatment situation in an image processing and computer-aided design system. Resulting forces, computed in a simulation-driven workflow based on patient monitoring and motion capturing were used to simulate the mechanical fracture environment before and after exchange nailing. Implant stresses for the initial and revision situation, as well as interfragmentary movement, resulting hydrostatic, and octahedral shear strain were calculated and compared to the clinical course. The simulation model was able to adequately predict hardware stresses in the initial situation where mechanical implant failure occurred. Furthermore, hydrostatic and octahedral shear strain of the revision situation were calculated to be within published healing boundaries-accordingly the fracture healed uneventfully. Our workflow is able to determine the mechanical environment of a fracture fixation, calculate implant stresses, interfragmentary movement, and the resulting strain. Critical mechanical boundary conditions for fracture healing can be determined in relation to individual loading parameters. Based on this individualized treatment recommendations during the early post-operative phase in lower leg fractures are possible in order to prevent implant failure and non-union development.

Indexed as

fracture healingindividualized simulationnon-unionsimulationtibia

Identifiers

PMID34660686
PMCPMC8511819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.