Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34660657›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2021

Investigation of Protein and Epitope Characteristics of Oats and Its Implications for Celiac Disease.

Gyöngyvér Gell, Zsuzsanna Bugyi, Christakis George Florides, Zsófia Birinyi, Dalma Réder, Zsuzsanna Szegő, Edina Mucsi, Eszter Schall, Katalin Ács, Bernadett Langó and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Feeding of Undocked Pigs: Effects of Feed Components and Feed Composition.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Changes in Plant and Grain Quality of Winter Oat (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Gyöngyvér GellDepartment of Biological Resources, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, EötvösLoránd Research Network, Martonvásár, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna BugyiDepartment of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Research Group of Cereal Science and Food Quality, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Christakis George FloridesMurdoch University, College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Perth, WA, Australia.
Zsófia BirinyiDepartment of Biological Resources, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, EötvösLoránd Research Network, Martonvásár, Hungary.
Dalma RéderDepartment of Biological Resources, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, EötvösLoránd Research Network, Martonvásár, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna SzegőDepartment of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Research Group of Cereal Science and Food Quality, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Edina MucsiDepartment of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Research Group of Cereal Science and Food Quality, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Eszter SchallDepartment of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Research Group of Cereal Science and Food Quality, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Katalin ÁcsCereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
Bernadett LangóCereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
Szandra PurgelCereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
Katalin SimonFirst Pest Mill and Bakery Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
Balázs VargaCereal Breeding Department, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, EötvösLoránd Research Network, Martonvásár, Hungary.
Gyula VidaCereal Breeding Department, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, EötvösLoránd Research Network, Martonvásár, Hungary.
Ottó VeiszCereal Breeding Department, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, EötvösLoránd Research Network, Martonvásár, Hungary.
Sándor TömösköziDepartment of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Research Group of Cereal Science and Food Quality, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Ferenc BékésFBFD PTY Ltd., Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Budapest University of Technology and Economics · HUCentre for Agricultural Research · HUCereal Research (Hungary) · HUAgricultural Institute · HUHUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine · HUMurdoch University · AUSydney College of Divinity · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of pure oats (oats cultivated with special care to avoid gluten contamination from wheat, rye, and barley) in the gluten-free diet (GFD) represents important nutritional benefits for the celiac consumer. However, emerging evidence suggests that some oat cultivars may contain wheat gliadin analog polypeptides. Consequently, it is necessary to screen oats in terms of protein and epitope composition to be able to select safe varieties for gluten-free applications. The overall aim of our study is to investigate the variability of oat protein composition directly related to health-related and techno-functional properties. Elements of an oat sample population representing 162 cultivated varieties from 20 countries and the protein composition of resulting samples have been characterized. Size distribution of the total protein extracts has been analyzed by size exclusion-high performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC) while the 70% ethanol-extracted proteins were analyzed by RP-HPLC. Protein extracts separated into three main groups of fractions on the SE-HPLC column: polymeric proteins, avenins (both containing three subgroups based on their size), and soluble proteins, representing respectively 68.79-86.60, 8.86-27.72, and 2.89-11.85% of the total protein content. The ratio of polymeric to monomeric proteins varied between 1.37 and 3.73. Seventy-six reversed phase-HPLC-separated peaks have been differentiated from the ethanol extractable proteins of the entire population. Their distribution among the cultivars varied significantly, 6-23 peaks per cultivar. The number of appearances of peaks also showed large variation: one peak has been found in 107 samples, while 15 peaks have been identified, which appeared in less than five cultivars. An estimation method for ranking the avenin-epitope content of the samples has been developed by using MS spectrometric data of collected RP-HPLC peaks and bioinformatics methods. Using ELISA methodology with the R5 antibody, a high number of the investigated samples were found to be contaminated with wheat, barley, or rye.

Indexed as

aveninceliac diseaseELISAepitope predictionHPLCoat

Identifiers

PMID34660657
PMCPMC8511309
OpenAlexW3203225112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.